Peat, Marwick, Mitchell Co. v. Superior Court
200 Cal.App.3d 272 (Cal. Ct. App. 1988) Cited 80 timesImposing evidentiary sanction
Mozzetti v. City of Brisbane
67 Cal.App.3d 565 (Cal. Ct. App. 1977) Cited 108 timesRecognizing there is no fixed, inflexible rule for determining the measure of damages for injury to or destruction of property and whatever formula is most appropriate in a particular case will be adopted
William Dal Porto & Sons, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board
191 Cal.App.3d 1195 (Cal. Ct. App. 1987) Cited 14 timesIn William Dal Porto Sons, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Bd. (1987) 191 Cal.App.3d 1195 [ 237 Cal.Rptr. 206], an equal protection claim was rejected where employers were required by the state to comply with orders not imposed on labor unions.
Engle v. City of Oroville
238 Cal.App.2d 266 (Cal. Ct. App. 1965) Cited 24 timesHolding that damages for lost wages must not be speculative
Page v. Bakersfield Uniform Etc. Co.
239 Cal.App.2d 762 (Cal. Ct. App. 1966) Cited 20 timesDocket No. 511. January 31, 1966. APPEAL from a portion of a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. John D. Jelletich, Judge. Affirmed. Action to recover damages and to enjoin rival businesses from engaging in unfair trade practices with intent to destroy competition. Judgment finding each party had engaged in unfair practices and ordering permanent injunctions as to each party affirmed. Gill Bowles and S.B. Gill for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Goldberg, Noriega Sullivan and David F. Goldberg
Section 352 - Balancing of probative value with prejudice
Cal. Evid. Code § 352 Cited 13,146 times 5 Legal AnalysesGiving a trial court discretion to exclude evidence "if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the probability that its admission will necessitate undue consumption of time or (b) create substantial danger of undue prejudice, of confusing the issues, or of misleading the jury"