§Why CasetextPricing

Laurence Harper vs. Raul Najera Lopez

Motion in Limine

9 Cited authorities

  1. Geier v. Am. Honda Motor Co.

    529 U.S. 861 (2000)   Cited 809 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding the absence of an express pre-emption clause “does not bar the ordinary working of conflict pre-emption principles”

  2. Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. University of Southern California

    55 Cal.4th 747 (Cal. 2012)   Cited 764 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Finding trial court properly excluded expert testimony

  3. People v. Stoll

    49 Cal.3d 1136 (Cal. 1989)   Cited 308 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding Kelly inapplicable to psychological methods that were “not new to psychology or the law”

  4. People v. Venegas

    18 Cal.4th 47 (Cal. 1998)   Cited 207 times
    Applying the Watson standard for evaluating prejudice when evidence is improperly admitted under Kelly

  5. Pacific Gas Electric Co. v. Zuckerman

    189 Cal.App.3d 1113 (Cal. Ct. App. 1987)   Cited 215 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Zuckerman, an expert estimated the value of a property by using a comparative property that "include[d] various fixtures, rights, improvements, and personal property which the property being [valued did] not include."

  6. Hyatt v. Sierra Boat Co.

    79 Cal.App.3d 325 (Cal. Ct. App. 1978)   Cited 132 times
    In Hyatt v. Sierra Boat Co. (1978) 79 Cal.App.3d 325 (Hyatt), the plaintiff was driving in the right lane on a highway late at night when his vehicle apparently struck a glancing blow against the defendant's boat trailer, which was parked alongside the highway, then skidded or rolled into a telephone pole.

  7. Geffcken v. D'Andrea

    137 Cal.App.4th 1298 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 56 times
    Finding that under California's Kelly-Frye standard, expert testimony was inadmissible because appellants failed to show that the relationship between mold exposure and sick building syndrome has gained general acceptance in the relevant scientific community

  8. Section 720 - Qualifications

    Cal. Evid. Code § 720   Cited 847 times
    Involving expert testimony

  9. Section 4 - [Repealed]

    Okla. Stat. tit. 71 § 4

    Okla. Stat. tit. 71, § 4 Added by Laws 1959, p. 327, § 4, eff. 7/1/1959. Amended by Laws 1988, c. 108, § 3, eff. 11/1/1988; Laws 1990, c. 71, § 1, eff. 9/1/1990; Laws 1992, c. 241, § 3, eff. 7/1/1992; Laws 1993, c. 247, § 1, eff. 7/1/1993; Repealed by Laws 2003 , SB 724, c. 347, § 53, eff. 7/1/2004.