21 Cited authorities

Lyle v. Warner Brothers Television Productions
38 Cal.4th 264 (Cal. 2006) Cited 474 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that "California courts have adopted the same standard as [Title VII] for hostile work environment sexual harassment claims."
Reno v. Baird
18 Cal.4th 640 (Cal. 1998) Cited 593 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that FEHA's provisions regarding employment discrimination applied only to employers, in contrast to provisions regarding harassment which did apply to individuals as well as employers
Janken v. GM Hughes Electronics
46 Cal.App.4th 55 (Cal. Ct. App. 1996) Cited 555 times
Holding that "[t]he intentional infliction of emotional distress claim fails" where "[t]he factual allegations . . . plead claims of discrimination" but not more
Fisher v. San Pedro Peninsula Hosp.
214 Cal.App.3d 590 (Cal. Ct. App. 1989) Cited 509 times
Holding that despite sufficiently pled sexual harassment by a physician, plaintiff must also sufficiently plead employer ratified acts to plead prayer for punitive damages against employer
C.A. v. William S. Hart Union High School District
53 Cal.4th 861 (Cal. 2012) Cited 226 times 3 Legal Analyses
Finding that supervisory personnel could be vicariously liable and noting that "public school personnel may be individually liable for their negligent failure to protect students from harm at others' hands"
Faust v. California Portland Cement Co.
150 Cal.App.4th 864 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007) Cited 251 times 2 Legal Analyses
Finding fact issue on plaintiff's FEHA disability discrimination claim with respect to employer's knowledge where a physician's work status report advised employer that plaintiff was "unable to perform regular job duties..."
Hendy v. Losse
54 Cal.3d 723 (Cal. 1991) Cited 332 times
Affirming an order sustaining defendants' demurrer without leave to amend when the plaintiff filed an amended complaint omitting harmful allegations from the original unverified complaint
Rope v. Auto-Chlor System of Washington, Inc.
220 Cal.App.4th 635 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013) Cited 100 times 15 Legal Analyses
Holding that to constitute protected activity, there must be "some degree of opposition to . . . the employer's conduct or practices based on the employee's reasonable belief that the employer's action or practice is unlawful."
Minsky v. City of Los Angeles
11 Cal.3d 113 (Cal. 1974) Cited 154 times
Holding "government in effect occupies the position of bailee when it seizes from an arrestee property that is not shown to be contraband"
Hobson v. Raychem Corp.
73 Cal.App.4th 614 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999) Cited 71 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding "the inability to perform one particular job, or to work under a particular supervisor, does not constitute a qualified disability" under FEHA
Section 12926 - [Effective Until 1/1/2025] Definitions in connection with unlawful practices
Cal. Gov. Code § 12926 Cited 217 times 4 Legal Analyses
Providing examples of "reasonable accommodation"
Section 825 - Generally
Cal. Gov. Code § 825 Cited 181 times
Providing for indemnification of a public employee by his or her employer for claims "arising out of an act or omission occurring within the scope of his or her employment"
Section 18-21.022 - Payments and Fees for Aquacultural Activities
Fla. Admin. Code R. 18-21.022 Cited 1 times
(1) The application fee for an aquaculture lease is $200.00. (2) The fee for assignment, sublease or transfer of an aquaculture lease is $50.00. (3) The annual rental fees for aquaculture authorizations shall be the dollar amount of the fixed rate consideration as determined by the Board in accordance with Section 253.71(2), F.S., but not less than $15.00 per acre, or fraction thereof, for a bottom lease and $30 per acre, or fraction thereof, when the lease includes the water column: bottom leases

Kirsten Yonan vs. California Department of Parks And Recreation

21 Cited authorities

Holding that "California courts have adopted the same standard as [Title VII] for hostile work environment sexual harassment claims."

Holding that FEHA's provisions regarding employment discrimination applied only to employers, in contrast to provisions regarding harassment which did apply to individuals as well as employers

Holding that "[t]he intentional infliction of emotional distress claim fails" where "[t]he factual allegations . . . plead claims of discrimination" but not more

Holding that despite sufficiently pled sexual harassment by a physician, plaintiff must also sufficiently plead employer ratified acts to plead prayer for punitive damages against employer

Finding that supervisory personnel could be vicariously liable and noting that "public school personnel may be individually liable for their negligent failure to protect students from harm at others' hands"

Finding fact issue on plaintiff's FEHA disability discrimination claim with respect to employer's knowledge where a physician's work status report advised employer that plaintiff was "unable to perform regular job duties..."

Affirming an order sustaining defendants' demurrer without leave to amend when the plaintiff filed an amended complaint omitting harmful allegations from the original unverified complaint

Holding that to constitute protected activity, there must be "some degree of opposition to . . . the employer's conduct or practices based on the employee's reasonable belief that the employer's action or practice is unlawful."

Holding "government in effect occupies the position of bailee when it seizes from an arrestee property that is not shown to be contraband"

Holding "the inability to perform one particular job, or to work under a particular supervisor, does not constitute a qualified disability" under FEHA

Providing examples of "reasonable accommodation"

Providing for indemnification of a public employee by his or her employer for claims "arising out of an act or omission occurring within the scope of his or her employment"