23 Cited authorities

AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion
563 U.S. 333 (2011) Cited 3,989 times 605 Legal Analyses
Holding that a ban on collective-action waivers in those contracts worked to "disfavor arbitration"
AT&T Techs., Inc. v. Commc'ns Workers of Am.
475 U.S. 643 (1986) Cited 5,528 times 25 Legal Analyses
Holding that it was for the court to decide whether a particular labor dispute fell within the arbitration clause of a collective-bargaining agreement
Doctor's Assocs., Inc. v. Casarotto
517 U.S. 681 (1996) Cited 1,924 times 13 Legal Analyses
Holding "that Montana's first-page notice requirement, which governs not ‘any contract,’ but specifically and solely contracts ‘subject to arbitration,’ conflicts with the FAA and is therefore displaced by the federal measure."
Am. Express Co. v. Italian Colors Rest.
570 U.S. 228 (2013) Cited 701 times 32 Legal Analyses
Holding that a class waiver in an arbitration agreement is enforceable under the FAA even when a plaintiff shows that the waiver will prevent her from vindicating her statutory rights
Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc.
24 Cal.4th 83 (Cal. 2000) Cited 1,853 times 46 Legal Analyses
Holding unilateral arbitration provision substantively unconscionable
Pinnacle Museum Tower Association v. Pinnacle Market Development (Us), LLC
55 Cal.4th 223 (Cal. 2012) Cited 675 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that an arbitration clause in CC&Rs was binding on the homeowners' association, even though the association did not exist as an independent entity when the CC&Rs were drafted and recorded
Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams
279 F.3d 889 (9th Cir. 2002) Cited 348 times
Holding that an employer's Dispute Resolution Agreement was a contract of adhesion
Stirlen v. Supercuts, Inc.
51 Cal.App.4th 1519 (Cal. Ct. App. 1997) Cited 335 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that the element of procedural unconscionability is established where the challenged clause is part of a contract of adhesion
Mercuro v. Superior Court
96 Cal.App.4th 167 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002) Cited 268 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding arbitration provision substantively unconscionable where it "compel[ed] arbitration of the claims employees are more likely to bring"
Fitz v. NCR Corp.
118 Cal.App.4th 702 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004) Cited 241 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that an incorporated AAA discovery rule was deliberately hidden by a conflicting discovery provision in the arbitration agreement

Colony American Finance, LLC vs. Ali El Wakeel

23 Cited authorities

Holding that a ban on collective-action waivers in those contracts worked to "disfavor arbitration"

Holding that it was for the court to decide whether a particular labor dispute fell within the arbitration clause of a collective-bargaining agreement

Holding "that Montana's first-page notice requirement, which governs not ‘any contract,’ but specifically and solely contracts ‘subject to arbitration,’ conflicts with the FAA and is therefore displaced by the federal measure."

Holding that a class waiver in an arbitration agreement is enforceable under the FAA even when a plaintiff shows that the waiver will prevent her from vindicating her statutory rights

Holding unilateral arbitration provision substantively unconscionable

Holding that an arbitration clause in CC&Rs was binding on the homeowners' association, even though the association did not exist as an independent entity when the CC&Rs were drafted and recorded

Holding that an employer's Dispute Resolution Agreement was a contract of adhesion

Holding that the element of procedural unconscionability is established where the challenged clause is part of a contract of adhesion

Holding arbitration provision substantively unconscionable where it "compel[ed] arbitration of the claims employees are more likely to bring"

Holding that an incorporated AAA discovery rule was deliberately hidden by a conflicting discovery provision in the arbitration agreement