§Why CasetextPricing

Elijah Pomaika Simone vs. Bruce Graham Jameson

Motion to Strike or Tax Costs

13 Cited authorities

  1. Jones v. Dumrichob

    63 Cal.App.4th 1258 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 150 times
    Finding no abuse of discretion in awarding expert fees pursuant to a section 998 offer consisting of a cost waiver, but no monetary amount

  2. Ladas v. California State Auto. Assn.

    19 Cal.App.4th 761 (Cal. Ct. App. 1993)   Cited 116 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding "fees are not authorized for exhibits not used at trial" under section 1033.5, subdivision

  3. Santantonio v. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co.

    25 Cal.App.4th 102 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 108 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Deeming waived and declining to consider plaintiff's argument that defendant's section 998 offer was invalid because it purportedly required acceptance by all plaintiffs, where plaintiff argued below only that there was no unity of interest among defendants and the offer was not reasonable

  4. Melnyk v. Robledo

    64 Cal.App.3d 618 (Cal. Ct. App. 1976)   Cited 155 times
    Noting that "the trial court . . . is not bound by the itemization claimed in the attorney's affidavit"

  5. El Dorado Meat Co. v. Yosemite Meat and Locker Service, Inc.

    150 Cal.App.4th 612 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 55 times
    Affirming trial court's allowance of costs incurred in creating an exhibit summarizing important financial data, and observing that "[t]he idea that the cost is not allowable because the exhibit could have been created using adding machines, ledger paper, and pencils instead of an electronic database is antiquated"

  6. Bach v. County of Butte

    215 Cal.App.3d 294 (Cal. Ct. App. 1989)   Cited 81 times
    Affirming trial court's refusal to hold evidentiary hearing on remand where prior opinion of Court of Appeal did not direct or authorize trial court to hold such hearing

  7. Foothill-De Anza Community College Dist. v. Emerich

    158 Cal.App.4th 11 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 36 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Restricting the vote on a community college bond measure to residents had a rational basis; there was a probability that "local residents had a greater knowledge and interest in local affairs, while nonresident property owners would mainly be interested in lower taxes"

  8. Rouland v. Pacific Specialty Ins. Co.

    220 Cal.App.4th 280 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013)   Cited 15 times
    In Rouland v. Pacific Specialty Insurance Co. (2013) 220 Cal.App.4th 280 (Rouland), the defendant's section 998 offers included a provision that asked the plaintiffs to file an "'"Offer and Notice of Acceptance"'" with the trial court.

  9. Michelson v. Camp

    72 Cal.App.4th 955 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999)   Cited 29 times
    Applying the full-credit-bid rule to third parties

  10. Perko's Enterprises, Inc. v. RRNS Enterprises

    4 Cal.App.4th 238 (Cal. Ct. App. 1992)   Cited 29 times

    Docket No. F015043. March 5, 1992. [Opinion certified for partial publication.] Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 976.1, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts I and IV. Appeal from Superior Court of Fresno County, No. 423282-3, James L. Quaschnick, Judge. COUNSEL Thomas Nast for Plaintiff and Appellant. Lawrence A. Haun and Roger A. Brown for Defendants and Respondents. OPINION STONE (W.A.), Acting P.J. In the published portion of this opinion we will conclude

  11. Section 1033.5 - Items allowable as costs

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1033.5   Cited 1,488 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Permitting various types of service as costs

  12. Rule 3.1700 - Prejudgment costs

    Cal. R. 3.1700   Cited 276 times

    (a) Claiming costs (1)Trial costs A prevailing party who claims costs must serve and file a memorandum of costs within 15 days after the date of service of the notice of entry of judgment or dismissal by the clerk under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.5 or the date of service of written notice of entry of judgment or dismissal, or within 180 days after entry of judgment, whichever is first. The memorandum of costs must be verified by a statement of the party, attorney, or agent that to the best