§Why CasetextPricing

Beach Galleria, LLC vs. Chieh Teh Li

Motion to Compel Discovery

6 Cited authorities

  1. Section 2023.030 - Sanctions for misuse of discovery process

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2023.030   Cited 518 times
    Providing for sanctions "[t]o the extent authorized by the chapter governing any particular discovery method"

  2. Section 2023.010 - Misuses of discovery process

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2023.010   Cited 368 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Defining unsuccessful and unjustified opposition to a motion to compel as a misuse of the discovery process

  3. Section 250 - "Writing"

    Cal. Evid. Code § 250   Cited 285 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Providing that a "writing" is defined to include "every other means of recording upon any tangible thing, any form of communication or representation, including letters, words, pictures, sounds, or symbols, or combinations thereof, and any record thereby created, regardless of the manner in which the record has been stored."

  4. Section 2031.300 - Failure to serve timely response; motion to compel response

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2031.300   Cited 68 times
    Requiring the losing party on a motion to compel to pay sanctions unless the court finds that party "acted with substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust"

  5. Section 2031.010 - Generally

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2031.010   Cited 50 times
    Using the term "demand"

  6. Section 2031.260 - Time for service of original of response; time from date of service to respond

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2031.260   Cited 14 times

    (a) Within 30 days after service of a demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling, the party to whom the demand is directed shall serve the original of the response to it on the party making the demand, and a copy of the response on all other parties who have appeared in the action, unless on motion of the party making the demand, the court has shortened the time for response, or unless on motion of the party to whom the demand has been directed, the court has extended the time for response