§Why CasetextPricing

Vinh Nguyen vs. Ymt, Inc.

Motion in Limine

10 Cited authorities

  1. Jennings v. Palomar Pomerado Health Systems, Inc.

    114 Cal.App.4th 1108 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003)   Cited 259 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Striking expert opinion and noting that "plaintiff must offer an expert opinion that contains a reasoned explanation illuminating why the facts have convinced the expert, and therefore should convince the jury, that it is more probable than not the negligent act was a cause-in-fact of the plaintiff's injury"

  2. Bushling v. Fremont Medical Center

    117 Cal.App.4th 493 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 182 times
    Considering medical records and physician's declaration that the treatment provided was within the standard of care

  3. Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. University of Southern California

    215 Cal.App.4th 1495 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013)   Cited 59 times

    B202789 2013-05-2 SARGON ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA et al., Defendants and Appellants. See 9 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (5th ed. 2008) Appeal, § 459 et seq. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Terry A. Green, Judge. Affirmed. (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC209992) JOHNSON See 9 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (5th ed. 2008) Appeal, § 459 et seq. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Terry

  4. People v. Brown

    49 Cal.2d 577 (Cal. 1958)   Cited 141 times
    Holding judgment on second count should be reversed because permitting convictions on both counts would violate section 654

  5. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 97,825 times   674 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

  6. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,753 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system

  7. Section 352 - Balancing of probative value with prejudice

    Cal. Evid. Code § 352   Cited 12,949 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Giving a trial court discretion to exclude evidence "if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the probability that its admission will necessitate undue consumption of time or (b) create substantial danger of undue prejudice, of confusing the issues, or of misleading the jury"

  8. Section 350 - Relevance

    Cal. Evid. Code § 350   Cited 1,619 times
    Providing only relevant evidence is admissible

  9. Section 800 - Lay witness opinion testimony

    Cal. Evid. Code § 800   Cited 649 times
    Requiring lay opinion testimony be "[h]elpful to a clear understanding of testimony"

  10. Rule 3.1350 - Motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication

    Cal. R. 3.1350   Cited 230 times

    (a) Definitions As used in this rule, (1) "Motion" refers to either a motion for summary judgment or a motion for summary adjudication. (2) "Material facts" are facts that relate to the cause of action, claim for damages, issue of duty, or affirmative defense that is the subject of the motion and that could make a difference in the disposition of the motion. (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2016.) (b) Motion for summary adjudication If made in the alternative, a motion for summary adjudication