§Why CasetextPricing

Mohammad Farha vs. Michelson Marketplace Venture, LLC

Opposition

16 Cited authorities

  1. Quiroz v. Seventh Ave. Center

    140 Cal.App.4th 1256 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 352 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding it was "irrelevant" that "fact" in separate statement of undisputed facts was undisputed by opposing party because "fact" was a legal conclusion

  2. Reichert v. General Ins. Co. of America

    68 Cal.2d 822 (Cal. 1968)   Cited 522 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Adding a fourth element, the plaintiff's performance or excuse for nonperformance under the contract

  3. Barnett v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.

    90 Cal.App.4th 500 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001)   Cited 188 times
    Finding a potential for coverage for defamation even though the underlying action did not allege all of the elements of that cause of action

  4. Frittelli, Inc. v. 350 North Canon Drive, LP

    202 Cal.App.4th 35 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 103 times
    In Frittelli, Inc. v. 350 N. Canon Drive, LP, 202 Cal. App. 4th 35, 45-46 (2011), the lease contained a disclaimer of liability for any disruption due to remodeling of the premises by the lessor, but the language specifically stated that it applied to remodels "[a]t any time during the Term."

  5. CLD Construction, Inc. v. City of San Ramon

    120 Cal.App.4th 1141 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 86 times
    Remarking that representation by an attorney "is not an absolute prerequisite to the court's fundamental power to hear or determine a case ... it is more appropriate and just to treat a corporation's failure to be represented by an attorney as a defect that may be corrected ... in the sound discretion of the court"

  6. Appalachian Ins. Co. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.

    214 Cal.App.3d 1 (Cal. Ct. App. 1989)   Cited 104 times
    Holding that prompt and good faith voluntary dismissal of improperly removed action did not preclude application of equitable tolling

  7. George v. Auto. Club of South. California

    201 Cal.App.4th 1112 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 47 times
    Applying rule, but finding no ambiguity

  8. Velez v. Smith

    142 Cal.App.4th 1154 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 46 times
    Finding trial court did not err by declining to grant appellant's request to present testimonial evidence at hearing on motion to strike

  9. Clauson v. Superior Court

    67 Cal.App.4th 1253 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 36 times
    Deciding whether plaintiffs could seek at the pleading stage punitive damages and statutory penalties for unlawful wiretapping

  10. Acoustics, Inc. v. Trepte Constr. Co.

    14 Cal.App.3d 887 (Cal. Ct. App. 1971)   Cited 80 times
    In Acoustics, Inc. v. Trepte Constr. Co. (1971) 14 Cal.App.3d 887 [ 92 Cal.Rptr. 723], subcontractor Acoustics sued the general contractor (Steiny) and the surety (General) in a consolidated action, alleging causes of action for breach of contract by the general contractor and on the payment bond.