§Why CasetextPricing

Strohmeyer vs. Santos Electronics, Inc.

Motion to Strike or Tax Costs

10 Cited authorities

  1. Seever v. Copley Press, Inc.

    141 Cal.App.4th 1550 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 88 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Concluding "the trial court was well within its discretion in awarding travel costs to depositions"

  2. Ladas v. California State Auto. Assn.

    19 Cal.App.4th 761 (Cal. Ct. App. 1993)   Cited 119 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding "fees are not authorized for exhibits not used at trial" under section 1033.5, subdivision

  3. Ripley v. Pappadopoulos

    23 Cal.App.4th 1616 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 64 times
    Holding that Federal Express charges are expressly disallowed—presumably because they constitute "postage"

  4. Fairchild v. Park

    90 Cal.App.4th 919 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001)   Cited 44 times
    Holding the implied warranty is implied in all residential leases in California

  5. Green v. County of Riverside

    238 Cal.App.4th 1363 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015)   Cited 19 times
    Affirming award of trial technician cost under this framework

  6. Posey v. State of California

    180 Cal.App.3d 836 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986)   Cited 48 times
    Holding that removal of a vehicle under § 22561 is "discretionary in nature"

  7. Ferrell v. County of San Diego

    90 Cal.App.4th 537 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001)   Cited 6 times
    Discussing § 1036

  8. Sequoia Vacuum Systems v. Stransky

    229 Cal.App.2d 281 (Cal. Ct. App. 1964)   Cited 40 times
    Holding that a fiduciary duty existed where the defendant was a "managerial employee and director of the . . . corporation"

  9. Moss v. Underwriters' Report, Inc.

    12 Cal.2d 266 (Cal. 1938)   Cited 49 times
    In Moss v. Underwriters' Report, Inc. (1938), 12 Cal.2d 266, 274-275 [9-12] [ 83 P.2d 503], it was pointed out that the statute (Code Civ. Proc., § 1033) which provides that a successful litigant furnish a memorandum of his costs and "necessary disbursements" in the action "does not contemplate that a defendant must pay all of the successful plaintiff's expenses in connection with the litigation," and that "the right to reimbursement for expenses depends upon the statutory provisions concerning costs and not upon the necessity, in the mind of the litigant, or his counsel, for the outlay."

  10. Rule 3.1700 - Prejudgment costs

    Cal. R. 3.1700   Cited 277 times

    (a) Claiming costs (1)Trial costs A prevailing party who claims costs must serve and file a memorandum of costs within 15 days after the date of service of the notice of entry of judgment or dismissal by the clerk under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.5 or the date of service of written notice of entry of judgment or dismissal, or within 180 days after entry of judgment, whichever is first. The memorandum of costs must be verified by a statement of the party, attorney, or agent that to the best