Kennemur v. State of California
133 Cal.App.3d 907 (Cal. Ct. App. 1982) Cited 123 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that a party may impeach an expert witness by showing the falsity of any matter upon which the expert based his or her opinion
Zellerino v. Brown
235 Cal.App.3d 1097 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991) Cited 75 timesIn Zellerino v. Brown (1991) 235 Cal.App.3d 1097 [ 1 Cal.Rptr.2d 222], the plaintiff, seeking to justify her failure to make a timely designation of expert witnesses, argued that she had not yet retained these witnesses as of the disclosure deadline.
Section 2034.300 - Exclusion of evidence of expert opinion of party not in compliance
Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2034.300 Cited 159 timesPertaining to expert witness testimony
Section 2031.050 - Supplemental demand
Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2031.050 Cited 6 times(a) In addition to the demands for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling permitted by this chapter, a party may propound a supplemental demand to inspect, copy, test, or sample any later acquired or discovered documents, tangible things, land or other property, or electronically stored information in the possession, custody, or control of the party on whom the demand is made. (b) A party may propound a supplemental demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling twice before the initial
Rule 2.251 - Electronic service
Cal. R. 2.251 Cited 15 times(a)Authorization for electronic service When a document may be served by mail, express mail, overnight delivery, or fax transmission, the document may be served electronically under Code of Civil Procedure section 1010.6, Penal Code section 690.5, and the rules in this chapter. For purposes of electronic service made pursuant to Penal Code section 690.5, express consent to electronic service is required.[]= (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2022; previously amended effective January 1, 2007