§Why CasetextPricing

Connie Parker vs. Nili N. Alai

Reply Other

10 Cited authorities

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green

    411 U.S. 792 (1973)   Cited 53,093 times   96 Legal Analyses
    Holding in employment discrimination case that statistical evidence of employer's general policy and practice may be relevant circumstantial evidence of discriminatory intent behind individual employment decision

  2. Lazar v. Superior Court

    12 Cal.4th 631 (Cal. 1996)   Cited 1,686 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that justifiable reliance is a required element of a fraud claim

  3. Small v. Fritz Cos., Inc.

    30 Cal.4th 167 (Cal. 2003)   Cited 636 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that complaint for negligent misrepresentation in a holder action must be "pled with the same specificity required in a holder's action for fraud."

  4. King v. United Parcel Services, Inc.

    152 Cal.App.4th 426 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 383 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer had no duty to accommodate employee who returned to work with a doctor's note releasing him back to "regular duties and hours" and who admitted he was able to "get the job done"

  5. Morgan v. AT&T Wireless Services Inc.

    177 Cal.App.4th 1235 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 255 times
    Holding "a fraudulent business practice is one that is likely to deceive members of the public"

  6. Whitmire v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.

    184 Cal.App.4th 1078 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 90 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Affirming summary judgment in favor of general contractor on ground plaintiff lacked evidence the general contractor performed work on asbestos-containing products while plaintiff was present

  7. Mixon v. Fair Employment & Housing Com.

    192 Cal.App.3d 1306 (Cal. Ct. App. 1987)   Cited 119 times
    Adopting the standards set by the United States Supreme Court for proving intentional discrimination

  8. Krasley v. Superior Court

    101 Cal.App.3d 425 (Cal. Ct. App. 1980)   Cited 15 times

    Docket No. 22463. January 25, 1980. COUNSEL Goldin, Haviland Leuthold and Richard R. Leuthold for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent. Donald A. Nunn for Real Party in Interest. OPINION BROWN (Gerald), P.J. Norman Krasley petitions for a writ of mandate to compel the trial court to vacate its order denying his motion for summary judgment and instead to enter summary judgment in his favor. The underlying action was brought by real party in interest James Brennan for specific performance or damages

  9. County of Los Angeles v. Security Ins. Co.

    52 Cal.App.3d 808 (Cal. Ct. App. 1975)   Cited 14 times

    Docket Nos. 45669, 46185. November 6, 1975. Appeal from Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. 943473, Gerald Malkan, Temporary Judge. Pursuant to Constitution, article VI, section 21. COUNSEL John H. Larson, County Counsel, and Arnold K. Graham, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Appellant and for Real Party in Interest. No appearance for Respondent. Ives, Kirwan Dibble, Martin J. Kirwan and Peter M. Fonda for Defendant and Respondent and for Petitioner. OPINION THOMPSON, J. In the case

  10. Section 437c - [Effective Until 1/1/2025] Motion for summary judgment

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 437c   Cited 8,377 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Ruling on summary judgment motion must be based on "papers submitted" with the motion