§Why CasetextPricing

Charles R. Tyler, as Trustee of The Charles Robert Tyler Trust Dated September 18, 1996 vs. Farzaneh Kianfard

Motion Other

3 Cited authorities

  1. Hudec v. Robertson

    210 Cal.App.3d 1156 (Cal. Ct. App. 1989)   Cited 14 times

    Docket No. D006845. May 23, 1989. Appeal from Superior Court of San Diego County, No. 561604, Alpha L. Montgomery, Sr., Judge. COUNSEL Singer Crawford and David P. Crawford for Defendant and Appellant. Suuzen Ty Anderson for Plaintiffs and Respondents. OPINION HUFFMAN, J. Nye W. Robertson appeals from a money judgment of $39,675 in favor of La Jolla Boulevard Associates (LJB Associates) entered pursuant to a postjudgment order in this unlawful detainer action. As we shall explain, the judgment must

  2. Lehr v. Crosby

    123 Cal.App.3d Supp. 1 (Cal. Super. 1981)   Cited 8 times

    123 Cal.App.3d Supp. 1 177 Cal.Rptr. 96 Alexander LEHR, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Ethel CROSBY, Defendant and Respondent, Myra Hazlett, Defendant and Appellant. Civ. A. No. 14801. Superior Court of California, Appellate Division, Los Angeles County July 7, 1981. [Copyrighted Material Omitted] [Copyrighted Material Omitted] Salishs&s Jordan and Steven Weiner, Walnut Creek, for plaintiff and appellant. Linton Joaquin, Keene, for defendant and appellant and for defendant respondent. FOSTER, Judge

  3. Pfitzer v. Candeias

    53 Cal.App. 737 (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)   Cited 16 times
    In Pfitzer v. Candeias, supra (53 Cal.App. 737), cited by plaintiffs, it was argued that the court should not have declared a forfeiture of the lease because the breach was capable of compensation in damages, citing section 3275 The court defined "wilful" in that section as meaning "voluntary" or "intentional" and not implying maliciousness, and held that as the breach was wilful and there was no measure of damages which could be applied, the court was not in error in declaring a forfeiture.