13 Cited authorities

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Tr. Co.

    339 U.S. 306 (1950)   Cited 10,422 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that due process requires a hearing "appropriate to the nature of the case"
  2. Magnuson v. Video Yesteryear

    85 F.3d 1424 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 110 times
    Holding that "Federal Express does not satisfy the requirements of Rule 5(b)," as "there is little doubt that 'mail' meant 'U.S. mail' in 1937, when Rule 5 was adopted"
  3. Bishop v. Silva

    234 Cal.App.3d 1317 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)   Cited 18 times
    In Bishop v. Silva (1991) 234 Cal.App.3d 1317 [ 285 Cal.Rptr. 910], summons was apparently served on the defendant in a timely fashion.
  4. Marshall v. State of New York

    144 Misc. 2d 193 (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 1989)   Cited 4 times
    Holding that service of claim by fax, which was not authorized by statute, was insufficient to obtain jurisdiction
  5. Sternbeck v. Buck

    148 Cal.App.2d 829 (Cal. Ct. App. 1957)   Cited 39 times
    In Sternbeck v. Buck, 148 Cal.App.2d 829 [ 307 P.2d 970], the defendant had moved to have his default set aside under Code of Civil Procedure section 473, on the grounds of excusable neglect and want of personal service of the summons.
  6. Coulston v. Cooper

    245 Cal.App.2d 866 (Cal. Ct. App. 1966)   Cited 12 times
    Addressing whether a defendant presumed to be a foreign corporation, could properly be served with a notice under a statute applicable only to “nonresident” car owners
  7. Rule 4 - Summons

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 4   Cited 71,368 times   127 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time
  8. Section 418.10 - Serving and filing notice of motion

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 418.10   Cited 448 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing that a defendant "may serve and file a notice of motion ... [t]o quash service of summons on the ground of lack of jurisdiction of the court over him or her."
  9. Section 2015.5 - Certificate or declaration under penalty of perjury of truth and correctness of matter

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2015.5   Cited 444 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Giving "certificate" filed in accordance with state statute similar force and effect to an affidavit
  10. Section 417.10 - Proof summons served on person within state

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 417.10   Cited 76 times
    Requiring proof of service “by the affidavit of the person making the service showing the time, place, and manner of service”
  11. Rule 3.55 - Court fees and costs included in all initial fee waivers

    Cal. R. 3.55   Cited 12 times

    Court fees and costs that must be waived upon granting an application for an initial fee waiver include: (1) Clerk's fees for filing papers; (2) Clerk's fees for reasonably necessary certification and copying; (3) Clerk's fees for issuance of process and certificates; (4) Clerk's fees for transmittal of papers; (5) Sheriff's and marshal's fees under article 7 of chapter 2 of part 3 of division 2 of title 3 of the Government Code (commencing with section 26720) ; (6) Reporter's fees for attendance

  12. Rule 3.56 - Additional court fees and costs that may be included in initial fee waiver

    Cal. R. 3.56   Cited 8 times

    Necessary court fees and costs that may be waived upon granting an application for an initial fee waiver, either at the outset or upon later application, include: (1) Jury fees and expenses; (2) Court-appointed interpreter's fees for witnesses; (3) Witness fees of peace officers whose attendance is reasonably necessary for prosecution or defense of the case; (4) Witness fees of court-appointed experts; and (5) Other fees or expenses as itemized in the application. Cal. R. Ct. 3.56 Rule 3.56 amended

  13. Rule 8.818 - Waiver of fees and costs

    Cal. R. 8.818   Cited 1 times

    (a) Applications for waiver of fees and costs (1)Appeals (A) If the trial court previously issued an order granting a party's request to waive court fees and costs in a case, and that fee waiver is still in effect, all of the court fees for an appeal to the appellate division in that case that are listed in (d) are waived by that order, and the party is not required to file a new application for waiver of court fees and costs for an appeal to the appellate division in that case. (B) If the trial