7 Cited authorities

  1. Nelson v. Anderson

    72 Cal.App.4th 111 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999)   Cited 287 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Finding that obligations violated by limiting plaintiff's role were owed to the corporation because the decisions "amount[ed] to alleged misfeasance or negligence in managing the corporation's business, causing the business to be a total failure"
  2. Davis v. KGO-T.V., Inc.

    17 Cal.4th 436 (Cal. 1998)   Cited 71 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Considering similar language in the California Fair Equipment and Housing Act
  3. Rouland v. Pacific Specialty Ins. Co.

    220 Cal.App.4th 280 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013)   Cited 15 times
    In Rouland v. Pacific Specialty Insurance Co. (2013) 220 Cal.App.4th 280 (Rouland), the defendant's section 998 offers included a provision that asked the plaintiffs to file an "'"Offer and Notice of Acceptance"'" with the trial court.
  4. Thon v. Thompson

    29 Cal.App.4th 1546 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 35 times
    Disagreeing court erred by, inter alia, "awarding costs absent sufficient detail of the expenditures"; defendant supplied itemized costs and attorney declaration asserting necessity, and "absent an explicit statement by the trial court to the contrary, it is presumed the court properly exercised its legal duty"
  5. Oak Grove School Dist. v. City Title Ins. Co.

    217 Cal.App.2d 678 (Cal. Ct. App. 1963)   Cited 93 times
    In Oak Grove SchoolDist. v. City Title Ins. Co. (1963) 217 Cal.App.2d 678 [ 32 Cal.Rptr. 288] defendants claimed costs and disbursements under Code of Civil Procedure section 1255a after the plaintiff school district abandoned its eminent domain proceeding.
  6. Perko's Enterprises, Inc. v. RRNS Enterprises

    4 Cal.App.4th 238 (Cal. Ct. App. 1992)   Cited 29 times

    Docket No. F015043. March 5, 1992. [Opinion certified for partial publication.] Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 976.1, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts I and IV. Appeal from Superior Court of Fresno County, No. 423282-3, James L. Quaschnick, Judge. COUNSEL Thomas Nast for Plaintiff and Appellant. Lawrence A. Haun and Roger A. Brown for Defendants and Respondents. OPINION STONE (W.A.), Acting P.J. In the published portion of this opinion we will conclude

  7. Section 1033.5 - Items allowable as costs

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1033.5   Cited 1,513 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Permitting various types of service as costs