§Why CasetextPricing

Albert Sukut vs. James Toner

Motion

9 Cited authorities

  1. Scott Co. v. Blount, Inc.

    20 Cal.4th 1103 (Cal. 1999)   Cited 292 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by finding that the plaintiff was a prevailing party despite the fact that the plaintiff originally sought $2 million in damages, but recovered only $440,000

  2. Nelson v. Anderson

    72 Cal.App.4th 111 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999)   Cited 287 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Finding that obligations violated by limiting plaintiff's role were owed to the corporation because the decisions "amount[ed] to alleged misfeasance or negligence in managing the corporation's business, causing the business to be a total failure"

  3. Perko's Enterprises, Inc. v. RRNS Enterprises

    4 Cal.App.4th 238 (Cal. Ct. App. 1992)   Cited 29 times

    Docket No. F015043. March 5, 1992. [Opinion certified for partial publication.] Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 976.1, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts I and IV. Appeal from Superior Court of Fresno County, No. 423282-3, James L. Quaschnick, Judge. COUNSEL Thomas Nast for Plaintiff and Appellant. Lawrence A. Haun and Roger A. Brown for Defendants and Respondents. OPINION STONE (W.A.), Acting P.J. In the published portion of this opinion we will conclude

  4. Republic Indemnity Co. v. Schofield

    47 Cal.App.4th 220 (Cal. Ct. App. 1996)   Cited 21 times
    Holding that plaintiffs who were employees of the insured corporation were not insured themselves under the terms of the policy and consequently had no standing to maintain a suit for breach of contract or bad faith against the insurer

  5. Dow v. Ross

    90 Cal. 562 (Cal. 1891)   Cited 19 times
    In Dow v. Ross, 90 Cal. 562 [27 P. 409, 410] (on the subject of filing cost bill), we find similar language, as follows: "Conceding, without deciding, that under the provisions of section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure, relief in a matter of this kind might be granted by the court upon a proper showing, still, we are satisfied that the showing here made was altogether insufficient to authorize the relief asked for."

  6. Section 1032 - Right of prevailing party to recover costs

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1032   Cited 1,888 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Governing awards of litigation costs other than fees

  7. Section 1033.5 - Items allowable as costs

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1033.5   Cited 1,508 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Permitting various types of service as costs

  8. Section 10 - Holidays within meaning of code

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 10   Cited 151 times

    Holidays within the meaning of this code are every Sunday and any other days that are specified or provided for as judicial holidays in Section 135. Ca. Civ. Proc. Code § 10 Amended by Stats 2001 ch 542 (SB 1112), s 1, eff. 1/1/2002.

  9. Rule 3.1700 - Prejudgment costs

    Cal. R. 3.1700   Cited 278 times

    (a) Claiming costs (1)Trial costs A prevailing party who claims costs must serve and file a memorandum of costs within 15 days after the date of service of the notice of entry of judgment or dismissal by the clerk under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.5 or the date of service of written notice of entry of judgment or dismissal, or within 180 days after entry of judgment, whichever is first. The memorandum of costs must be verified by a statement of the party, attorney, or agent that to the best