§Why CasetextPricing

Tahsin Khairi vs. Abdul Kalim

Motion in Limine

2 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Houston

    130 Cal.App.4th 279 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 179 times
    Concluding that four days of jury deliberations suggested "diligence" rather than a close case where the trial involved "over three dozen witnesses occurring on 10 different days spread over three weeks, as well as lengthy closing arguments and jury instructions spread over two additional days"

  2. Love v. Wolf

    226 Cal.App.2d 378 (Cal. Ct. App. 1964)   Cited 135 times
    In Wolf the profit from the sale of a drug was held admissible to show motive for alleged overpromotion of that drug to the medical profession that might be held to cancel out the effectiveness of an insert warning.