34 Cited authorities

  1. Addison v. State of California

    21 Cal.3d 313 (Cal. 1978)   Cited 608 times
    Holding a statute of limitations for filing suit may be tolled while plaintiff pursues the claim in another forum
  2. Green v. Baca

    226 F.R.D. 624 (C.D. Cal. 2005)   Cited 159 times
    Holding that bifurcation is appropriate when needed to protect individual officer defendants from prejudice that might result if a jury heard evidence regarding the municipal defendant's allegedly unconstitutional policies
  3. Elkins v. Derby

    12 Cal.3d 410 (Cal. 1974)   Cited 283 times
    Holding that the statute of limitations against an employer was tolled while an employee pursued his workers' compensation claims arising out of the same accident
  4. Gil v. Bank of America, Nat. Assn.

    138 Cal.App.4th 1371 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 97 times
    Analyzing corollary California statute, Cal. Comm. Code § 3420(b)
  5. Sun 'N Sand, Inc. v. United California Bank

    21 Cal.3d 671 (Cal. 1978)   Cited 208 times
    Holding that the "discovery" exception tolling operation of the statute of limitations is inapplicable where bank's allegations made clear that the delay in discovering its mistake was attributable to its own negligence
  6. Mills v. U.S. Bank

    166 Cal.App.4th 871 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 84 times
    Affirming the denial of a motion to compel for failing to comply with former rule 335, now 3.1345
  7. DRG/Beverly Hills, Ltd. v. Chopstix Dim Sum Cafe & Takeout III, Ltd.

    30 Cal.App.4th 54 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 124 times
    Noting that estoppel is a question of fact, to be decided by the court
  8. Valley Bank of Nev. v. Superior Court

    15 Cal.3d 652 (Cal. 1975)   Cited 196 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding plaintiff bank ordered to produce documents including private customer information must notify customers to enable them to object before disclosing their information
  9. In re Lifschutz

    2 Cal.3d 415 (Cal. 1970)   Cited 212 times
    Recognizing greater degree of confidentiality legally provided for psychotherapy than for other medical treatment
  10. Amerus Life Ins. Co. v. Bank of America, N.A.

    143 Cal.App.4th 631 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 72 times
    Noting that conversion claims have a three-year statute of limitations