66 Cited authorities

Lazar v. Superior Court
12 Cal.4th 631 (Cal. 1996) Cited 1,686 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that justifiable reliance is a required element of a fraud claim
Mycogen Corporation v. Monsanto Company
28 Cal.4th 888 (Cal. 2002) Cited 831 times
Holding that a judgment granting declaratory relief and decreeing specific performance barred, under claim preclusion, a subsequent suit for damages
Boeken v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.
48 Cal.4th 788 (Cal. 2010) Cited 562 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that for res judicata purposes, "a dismissal with prejudice is the equivalent of a final judgment on the merits, barring the entire cause of action"
Rosenthal v. Great W. Fin. Secs. Corp.
14 Cal.4th 394 (Cal. 1996) Cited 802 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding fraud in the inducement "occurs when the promisor knows what he is signing but his consent is induced by fraud"
Mabry v. Superior Court
185 Cal.App.4th 208 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010) Cited 494 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that a lender's noncompliance with section 2923.5 does not affect the title to the foreclosed property following a foreclosure sale
Crowley v. Katleman
8 Cal.4th 666 (Cal. 1994) Cited 608 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that "a suit for malicious prosecution lies for bringing an action charging multiple grounds of liability when some but not all of those grounds were asserted with malice and without probable cause"
Tarmann v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
2 Cal.App.4th 153 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991) Cited 498 times
Holding that, when suing a corporate defendant for fraud, a plaintiff must include “the names of the persons who made the allegedly fraudulent representations, their authority to speak, to whom they spoke, what they said or wrote, and when it was said or written”
Moeller v. Lien
25 Cal.App.4th 822 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994) Cited 421 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding "[t]he comprehensive statutory framework established to govern nonjudicial foreclosure sales is intended to be exhaustive"; declining to "incorporate" provision not set forth in statutory framework's "myriad" rules
Robi v. Five Platters, Inc.
838 F.2d 318 (9th Cir. 1988) Cited 440 times
Holding that a court has no obligation to raise preclusion on its own
Rockridge Trust v. Wells Fargo, N.A.
985 F. Supp. 2d 1110 (N.D. Cal. 2013) Cited 202 times
Holding that "[t]he denial of modification" where plaintiff "was in default on his mortgage at the time" "is not an adverse action"
Section 2605 - Servicing of mortgage loans and administration of escrow accounts
12 U.S.C. § 2605 Cited 3,773 times 25 Legal Analyses
Describing "qualified written request"

Sachidanand Sinha vs. U.S. Bank National association

66 Cited authorities

Holding that justifiable reliance is a required element of a fraud claim

Holding that a judgment granting declaratory relief and decreeing specific performance barred, under claim preclusion, a subsequent suit for damages

Holding that for res judicata purposes, "a dismissal with prejudice is the equivalent of a final judgment on the merits, barring the entire cause of action"

Holding fraud in the inducement "occurs when the promisor knows what he is signing but his consent is induced by fraud"

Holding that a lender's noncompliance with section 2923.5 does not affect the title to the foreclosed property following a foreclosure sale

Holding that "a suit for malicious prosecution lies for bringing an action charging multiple grounds of liability when some but not all of those grounds were asserted with malice and without probable cause"

Holding that, when suing a corporate defendant for fraud, a plaintiff must include “the names of the persons who made the allegedly fraudulent representations, their authority to speak, to whom they spoke, what they said or wrote, and when it was said or written”

Holding "[t]he comprehensive statutory framework established to govern nonjudicial foreclosure sales is intended to be exhaustive"; declining to "incorporate" provision not set forth in statutory framework's "myriad" rules

Holding that a court has no obligation to raise preclusion on its own

Holding that "[t]he denial of modification" where plaintiff "was in default on his mortgage at the time" "is not an adverse action"

Describing "qualified written request"