4 Cited authorities

  1. Valley Bank of Nev. v. Superior Court

    15 Cal.3d 652 (Cal. 1975)   Cited 196 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding plaintiff bank ordered to produce documents including private customer information must notify customers to enable them to object before disclosing their information
  2. Catholic Mut. Relief Soc'y v. Superior Court

    42 Cal.4th 358 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 35 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. S134545. August 27, 2007. Appeal from the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, JCCP No. 4297, Peter D. Lichtman, Judge. Borton, Petrini Conron, Rocky K. Copley, Jonathan P. Geen and Paul Kissel for Petitioners. Hancock Rothert Bunshoft, Paul J. Killion, Heidi H. Frenzel, Kathryn C. Ashton and Allegra A. Jones for Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London and Certain London Market Insurance and Reinsurance Companies as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioners. No appearance for Respondent. Kiesel

  3. Unzipped Apparel v. Bader

    156 Cal.App.4th 123 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 19 times
    Recognizing 60-day time limit under section 2025.480, subdivision (b) applies to nonparty deposition subpoena requesting business records, just as it applies to a subpoena for an oral or written deposition
  4. Section 2025.480 - Motion to compel answer or production

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2025.480   Cited 68 times
    Authorizing imposition of "an issue sanction, an evidence sanction, or a terminating sanction," but only "[i]f a deponent fails to obey an order" entered by the court in response to a motion to compel