§Why CasetextPricing

Rene Marentes vs. Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc.

Motion to Bifurcate

19 Cited authorities

  1. Angelo v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

    11 F.3d 957 (10th Cir. 1993)   Cited 216 times
    Holding that deposition testimony is normally inadmissible hearsay when submitted at trial

  2. In re Tobacco Cases II

    240 Cal.App.4th 779 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015)   Cited 94 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that disgorgement of profits made by defendant as a result of allegedly deceptive advertising practices for cigarettes was not a proper remedy under the UCL when plaintiffs obtained some value from the cigarettes because "restitution without proof of any loss to any plaintiff cannot be characterized as restitutionary "

  3. County of Los Angeles v. Southern California Edison Co.

    112 Cal.App.4th 1108 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003)   Cited 99 times
    Holding the county could not argue, for the first time on appeal, that the court did not correctly determine the value of the tax on its damage award because it had not moved for a new trial

  4. Feitelberg v. Credit Suisse First Boston, LLC

    134 Cal.App.4th 997 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 92 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that rule applies to class action plaintiffs

  5. Nelson v. Pearson Ford, Co.

    186 Cal.App.4th 983 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 58 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Involving stipulation to use statistical sampling methodology

  6. Grappo v. Coventry Financial Corp.

    235 Cal.App.3d 496 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)   Cited 67 times
    Concluding trial judge acted well within its discretion when they ordered the "initial threshold" issue tried first

  7. Metropolitan Water Dist. v. Imperial Irrigation

    80 Cal.App.4th 1403 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 48 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Metropolitan Water Dist. v. Imperial Irrigation Dist. (2000) 80 Cal.App.4th 1403, 96 Cal.Rptr.2d 314 (Imperial Irrigation) it was held, and the parties do not dispute, that the "wheeling statutes" (Wat. Code, § 1810 et seq.) do not as a matter of law prohibit the allocation of system-wide transportation costs to reasonable wheeling charges, so that wheeling rates need not be limited to the marginal cost of transporting water over the facilities used in a particular transaction.

  8. Olson v. Cohen

    106 Cal.App.4th 1209 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003)   Cited 38 times
    Construing agreement between parties for recovery of reasonable attorney fees

  9. Simon v. Philip Morris Incorporated

    200 F.R.D. 21 (E.D.N.Y. 2001)   Cited 40 times
    Discussing power of district court to grant partial certification or to bifurcate issues and collecting cases

  10. People v. First Federal Credit Corp.

    104 Cal.App.4th 721 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 35 times
    Declining to apply to a civil penalty award the holding of Adams v. Murakami 54 Cal.3d 105, 108–109, 284 Cal.Rptr. 318, 813 P.2d 1348 (Murakami) requiring evidence of a defendant’s financial condition to be presented by a plaintiff in a punitive damages case

  11. Rule 4 - Summons

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 4   Cited 71,368 times   127 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time

  12. Rule 42 - Consolidation; Separate Trials

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 42   Cited 9,422 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Granting court's authority to consolidate related cases or "issue any other orders to avoid unnecessary cost or delay."

  13. Section 2510 - Definitions

    18 U.S.C. § 2510   Cited 4,285 times   79 Legal Analyses
    Defining "[i]nvestigative or law enforcement officer" as an officer "empowered by law to conduct investigations of or to make arrests for [certain] offenses . . . and any attorney authorized by law to prosecute or participate in the prosecution of such offenses"