Gorman v. Tassajara Development Corp.
178 Cal.App.4th 44 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009) Cited 324 times 4 Legal AnalysesHolding that meals are not recoverable under Cal. Civ. P.Code § 1033.5.
Gottlieb v. Kest
141 Cal.App.4th 110 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006) Cited 182 timesIn Gottlieb, a participant in real estate venture sued his co-participant for breach of contract. The co-participant filed a cross-complaint against the participant and his companies.
Darr & Newman v. VRL International
129 Cal.App.4th 482 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005) Cited 47 timesMoving to quash summons on behalf of client for lack of sufficient contacts did not estop law firm from subsequently suing client for unpaid legal fees because argument in second proceeding for specific jurisdiction is based on different claim and different facts
Rule 2.251 - Electronic service
Cal. R. 2.251 Cited 15 times(a)Authorization for electronic service When a document may be served by mail, express mail, overnight delivery, or fax transmission, the document may be served electronically under Code of Civil Procedure section 1010.6, Penal Code section 690.5, and the rules in this chapter. For purposes of electronic service made pursuant to Penal Code section 690.5, express consent to electronic service is required.[]= (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2022; previously amended effective January 1, 2007