9 Cited authorities

  1. PLCM Group, Inc. v. Drexler

    22 Cal.4th 1084 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 1,230 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding no error in awarding "prevailing market rate for comparable legal services in San Francisco, where counsel is located" in a case heard in Los Angeles
  2. Komarova v. National Credit Acceptance, Inc.

    175 Cal.App.4th 324 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 132 times
    Holding that the violations that occurred during the continuing course of making harassing phone calls were not barred by the statute of limitations
  3. Syers Properties III, Inc. v. Rankin

    226 Cal.App.4th 691 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014)   Cited 108 times
    Finding no abuse of discretion in employing Laffey matrix in San Francisco litigation
  4. Berge v. International Harvester Co.

    142 Cal.App.3d 152 (Cal. Ct. App. 1983)   Cited 62 times
    In Berge, the expert offered an opinion on lost profits based not on the actual profits generated by the business, but instead, on a national average.
  5. Schoolcraft v. Ross

    81 Cal.App.3d 75 (Cal. Ct. App. 1978)   Cited 61 times
    In Schoolcraft v. Ross, 81 Cal.App.3d 75, 146 Cal.Rptr. 57 (1978), the trust deed at issue contained the same type of fire insurance clause as in this case.
  6. Section 303 - Service of process on limited liability companies

    N.Y. Limited Liability Company Law § 303   Cited 248 times
    Permitting service of process by personal delivery to the Secretary of State, requiring “duplicate copies of such process together with the statutory fee, which fee shall be a taxable disbursement”
  7. Section 2 - [Repealed]

    Okla. Stat. tit. 3 § 2

    Okla. Stat. tit. 3, § 2 Laws 1931, p. 193, § 2; Repealed by Laws 1947, SB 214, p. 31, §19, emerg. eff. 5/3/1947.

  8. Section 130.1 - Renumbered

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 130.1   Cited 192 times

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. Tit. 22 § 130.1

  9. Rule 3.1702 - Claiming attorney's fees

    Cal. R. 3.1702   Cited 334 times

    (a) Application Except as otherwise provided by statute, this rule applies in civil cases to claims for statutory attorney's fees and claims for attorney's fees provided for in a contract. Subdivisions (b) and (c) apply when the court determines entitlement to the fees, the amount of the fees, or both, whether the court makes that determination because the statute or contract refers to "reasonable" fees, because it requires a determination of the prevailing party, or for other reasons. (b) Attorney's