§Why CasetextPricing

Stephen Eldard vs. Hewlett-Packard Company

Reply to Motion

12 Cited authorities

  1. Amaral v. Cintas Corp.

    163 Cal.App.4th 1157 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 304 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that employees working on public works projects had a private right of action under the California living wage ordinance

  2. Nordstrom Com. Cases

    186 Cal.App.4th 576 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 104 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that settlements involving either coupons or vouchers are routinely approved as fair, adequate, and reasonable

  3. Nein v. Hostpro, Inc.

    174 Cal.App.4th 833 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 61 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Noting that "an implied covenant cannot create an obligation inconsistent with an express term of the agreement"

  4. Steinhebel v. Los Angeles Times Communications

    126 Cal.App.4th 696 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 53 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that chargebacks of advanced commissions when a customer cancels a subscription do not constitute the unlawful repayment of wages under § 221

  5. Johnson v. Hewlett-Packard Co.

    809 F. Supp. 2d 1114 (N.D. Cal. 2011)   Cited 37 times
    Reviewing various sections of the California Labor Code to determine which causes of action can be brought as private causes of action

  6. Peabody v. Time Warner Cable, Inc.

    59 Cal.4th 662 (Cal. 2014)   Cited 28 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the DLSE Manual's interpretation of a wage order even though "the DLSE's enforcement policies are not entitled to deference"

  7. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. Superior Court (Devon Harris)

    191 Cal.App.4th 210 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 28 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the civil penalty for violating an IWC wage order is not specifically provided for a cause of action brought under section 1198 for a violation of an IWC wage order

  8. Stuart v. Radioshack Corporation

    No. C-07-4499 EMC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2010)   Cited 15 times
    Finding 33% fee award "well within the range of percentages which courts have upheld as reasonable in other class action lawsuits"

  9. Khoa Dang Nguyen v. Wells Fargo Bank

    Case No. 16-CV-03043-LHK (N.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2016)   Cited 1 times

    Case No. 16-CV-03043-LHK 11-28-2016 KHOA DANG NGUYEN, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, et al., Defendants. LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. No. 8, 17, 22, 25, 34 Plaintiff Khoa Dang Nguyen ("Plaintiff"), proceeding pro se, sues Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., ("Wells Fargo") and John G. Stumpf (collectively, "Defendants"). ECF No. 1 ("Compl."). Before the Court is Defendants' motion to dismiss. ECF No. 8. Pursuant to Civil Local

  10. Cohn v. Bugas

    42 Cal.App.3d 381 (Cal. Ct. App. 1974)   Cited 11 times

    Docket No. 33143. October 8, 1974. Appeal from Superior Court of Sonoma County, No. 67295, Kenneth M. Eymann, Judge. COUNSEL Lovitt Hannan and Ronald Lovitt for Plaintiff and Appellant. Geary, Geary, Shea Pawson and William E. Geary for Defendants and Respondents. OPINION SIMS, J. Plaintiff sought to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly suffered in an automobile accident, and similar damages, together with punitive damages for alleged fraud in inducing her to release the claim for damages

  11. Section 2699 - Civil penalty; civil action by aggrieved employee to recover

    Cal. Lab. Code § 2699   Cited 1,391 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Providing that "[a]ny employee who prevails in any action" shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees

  12. Section 13520 - Definition of "Willful."

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 8 § 13520   Cited 125 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Providing that "a good faith dispute that any wages are due will preclude imposition of waiting time penalties under Section 203"