36 Cited authorities

  1. Moses H. Cone Hosp. v. Mercury Constr. Corp.

    460 U.S. 1 (1983)   Cited 9,875 times   36 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Will v. Calvert Fire Insurance did not overrule the “Colorado River test” because Will 's four dissenting Justices agreed with the concurring opinion that the test remained in effect
  2. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.

    537 U.S. 79 (2002)   Cited 1,966 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that compliance with a time-limit on the initiation of arbitration was not a gateway "question of arbitrability" that was reserved for the courts as it was procedural rather than substantive
  3. Volt Information Sciences, Inc. v. Board of Trustees

    489 U.S. 468 (1989)   Cited 2,650 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Federal Arbitration Act requires courts to enforce arbitration agreements according to their terms, including where the parties "specify by contract the rules under which arbitration will be conducted"
  4. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos. v. Dobson

    513 U.S. 265 (1995)   Cited 1,412 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in § 2, the phrase "involving commerce" shows Congress’s "intent to exercise [its] commerce power to the full"
  5. Prima Paint v. Flood Conklin

    388 U.S. 395 (1967)   Cited 2,575 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "except where the parties otherwise intend," "arbitration clauses as a matter of federal law are 'separable' from the contracts in which they are embedded"
  6. Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.

    417 U.S. 506 (1974)   Cited 1,310 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding Securities Exchange Act claim arbitrable
  7. Citizens Bank v. Alafabco, Inc.

    539 U.S. 52 (2003)   Cited 396 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the term "involving commerce" "encompasses a wider range of transactions than those actually 'in commerce'—that is, within the flow of interstate commerce."
  8. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Distajo

    107 F.3d 126 (2d Cir. 1997)   Cited 320 times
    Holding that a bond was not required where there was no proof of likelihood of harm
  9. Cotton v. Slone

    4 F.3d 176 (2d Cir. 1993)   Cited 336 times
    Holding that party having failed to seek interlocutory appeal under 9 U.S.C. § 16 from denial of motion to compel arbitration could not raise issue after actively litigating claim — including filing of motions and taking of at least two depositions — and losing on the merits
  10. Flores v. Lower E. Side Serv

    4 N.Y.3d 363 (N.Y. 2005)   Cited 226 times
    Holding that an "unsigned contract may be enforceable"
  11. Section 2 - Validity, irrevocability, and enforcement of agreements to arbitrate

    9 U.S.C. § 2   Cited 8,442 times   98 Legal Analyses
    Granting federal jurisdiction where there is "a transaction involving [interstate] commerce"