§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Catherine A. Gorman, Appellant,v.Kathleen M. Rice,, Respondent, et al., Respondent.

Brief

7 Cited authorities

  1. People v. McIntosh

    96 N.Y.2d 521 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 120 times
    In McIntosh, the Appellate Division, 274 A.D. 2d at 741-742, held that suspicion that a location is a known drug source of narcotics is sufficient articulable reason for the interdiction.

  2. Matter of Davis v. Brown

    87 N.Y.2d 626 (N.Y. 1996)   Cited 61 times

    Argued February 13, 1996 Decided March 28, 1996 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department. Mark W. Zeno, Kew Gardens, Robert M. Baum and Lori L. Zeno for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney of Queens County, Kew Gardens ( Andrew L. Crabtree and Steven J. Chananie of counsel), for Richard A. Brown, respondent pro se. Dennis C. Vacco, Attorney-General, New York City ( Arnold D. Fleischer and Barbara G. Billet of counsel), for Stanley Katz,

  3. People v. Catten

    69 N.Y.2d 547 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 39 times
    In Catten the mistrial was granted on the defendant's motion because of misleading discrepancies in the testimony concerning the identification of the defendant by the undercover officer who allegedly purchased drugs from him (id., at 551).

  4. People v. Dawkins

    82 N.Y.2d 226 (N.Y. 1993)   Cited 13 times

    Argued October 12, 1993 Decided November 16, 1993 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Ronald A. Zweibel, J. David Loftis, New York City, and Philip L. Weinstein for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney of Kings County, Brooklyn (Sholom J. Twersky and Roseann B. Mackechnie of counsel), for respondent. LEVINE, J. Defendant was tried on counts of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree and criminal possession

  5. People v. Rodriquez

    39 N.Y.2d 976 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 26 times

    Argued June 9, 1976 Decided July 6, 1976 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, MAX E. COOPER, J. Harvey L. Greenberg for appellant. Eugene Gold, District Attorney (Alan D. Rubinstein of counsel), for respondent. MEMORANDUM. Order of the Appellate Division affirmed. The identity, description and address of the civilian who was with the undercover police officer when defendant first sold the narcotics was disclosed before trial in the People's bill

  6. In re Napoli

    33 N.Y.2d 980 (N.Y. 1974)   Cited 25 times

    Argued January 18, 1974 Decided February 14, 1974 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department. Irving Anolik and Gregory J. Perrin for appellant. Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney ( Jonathan Lovett and Michael R. Juviler of counsel), respondent, pro se. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Samuel A. Hirshowitz and David R. Spiegel of counsel), for Supreme Court of the State of New York and other respondents. Order affirmed, without costs, on the opinion

  7. Matter of Napoli v. Supreme Court

    40 A.D.2d 159 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)   Cited 25 times
    In Napoli v. Supreme Court, 40 A.D.2d 159, 338 N.Y.S.2d 721 (1972), the defendant in a bench trial moved for a mistrial on the grounds that the prosecutor had withheld exculpatory material.