25 Cited authorities

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (1984) Cited 158,880 times 176 Legal Analyses
Holding an "error by counsel" doesn't "warrant setting aside the judgment of a criminal proceeding" where in the context of the whole proceeding the identified error "had no effect on the judgment"
Murray v. Carrier
477 U.S. 478 (1986) Cited 16,463 times 14 Legal Analyses
Holding that constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel may provide cause for a procedural default
Miranda v. Arizona
384 U.S. 436 (1966) Cited 60,311 times 64 Legal Analyses
Holding that statements obtained by custodial interrogation of a criminal defendant without warning of constitutional rights are inadmissible under the Fifth Amendment
Rhode Island v. Innis
446 U.S. 291 (1980) Cited 6,138 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding that a police officer's subjective intent to obtain incriminatory statements is not relevant to determining whether an interrogation has occurred
Missouri v. Seibert
542 U.S. 600 (2004) Cited 1,991 times 14 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[s]trategists dedicated to draining the substance out of" constitutional protections cannot accomplish by planning around these protections because it "effectively threatens to thwart [their] purpose"
Oregon v. Elstad
470 U.S. 298 (1985) Cited 2,921 times 15 Legal Analyses
Holding that Fifth Amendment Miranda violations do not require that fruits of otherwise voluntary statements be suppressed as tainted
Schmerber v. California
384 U.S. 757 (1966) Cited 5,012 times 26 Legal Analyses
Holding that a witness cannot rely on the privilege to decline to provide blood samples
People v. Benevento
91 N.Y.2d 708 (N.Y. 1998) Cited 4,215 times 2 Legal Analyses
In People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713-14 (1998), the New York Court of Appeals held that "meaningful representation" included a prejudice component which focuses on the "fairness of the process as a whole rather than [any] particular impact on the outcome of the case."
People v. Turner
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 8766 (N.Y. 2005) Cited 523 times 5 Legal Analyses
Finding appellate counsel ineffective for not raising ineffectiveness of trial counsel on appeal
People v. Huntley
15 N.Y.2d 72 (N.Y. 1965) Cited 1,462 times 2 Legal Analyses
Adopting a procedure for providing a separate hearing about the voluntariness of a confession to be offered in evidence against a defendant at his or her trial

The People, Respondent,v.Nadine Panton, Appellant.

25 Cited authorities

Holding an "error by counsel" doesn't "warrant setting aside the judgment of a criminal proceeding" where in the context of the whole proceeding the identified error "had no effect on the judgment"

Holding that constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel may provide cause for a procedural default

Holding that statements obtained by custodial interrogation of a criminal defendant without warning of constitutional rights are inadmissible under the Fifth Amendment

Holding that a police officer's subjective intent to obtain incriminatory statements is not relevant to determining whether an interrogation has occurred

Holding that "[s]trategists dedicated to draining the substance out of" constitutional protections cannot accomplish by planning around these protections because it "effectively threatens to thwart [their] purpose"

Holding that Fifth Amendment Miranda violations do not require that fruits of otherwise voluntary statements be suppressed as tainted

Holding that a witness cannot rely on the privilege to decline to provide blood samples

In People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713-14 (1998), the New York Court of Appeals held that "meaningful representation" included a prejudice component which focuses on the "fairness of the process as a whole rather than [any] particular impact on the outcome of the case."

Finding appellate counsel ineffective for not raising ineffectiveness of trial counsel on appeal

Adopting a procedure for providing a separate hearing about the voluntariness of a confession to be offered in evidence against a defendant at his or her trial