§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Isma McGhee, Also Known as Izzy, Appellant.

Brief

64 Cited authorities

  1. Delaware v. Van Arsdall

    475 U.S. 673 (1986)   Cited 7,283 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a restriction on defendant's ability to crossexamine witness in violation of Sixth Amendment was non-structural error

  2. Maryland v. Pringle

    540 U.S. 366 (2003)   Cited 2,256 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that probable cause existed to arrest all of a vehicle's occupants after police discovered cocaine and money over which no occupant claimed possession

  3. Davis v. Alaska

    415 U.S. 308 (1974)   Cited 5,691 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that this confrontation right is applicable to state and federal defendants alike

  4. Pennsylvania v. Ritchie

    480 U.S. 39 (1987)   Cited 2,674 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "criminal defendants have the right to the government’s assistance in compelling the attendance of favorable witnesses at trial and the right to put before a jury evidence that might influence the determination of guilt"

  5. People v. Sandoval

    34 N.Y.2d 371 (N.Y. 1974)   Cited 2,458 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the trial court must balance the "probative worth of evidence of prior specific criminal, vicious or immoral acts on the issue of the defendant's credibility on the one hand, and on the other the risk of unfair prejudice to the defendant"

  6. People v. Chipp

    75 N.Y.2d 327 (N.Y. 1990)   Cited 1,102 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that under the circumstances presented therein, defendant could not call the complaining witness at a pretrial suppression motion

  7. People v. Walker

    83 N.Y.2d 455 (N.Y. 1994)   Cited 523 times
    Noting the general rule that "the nature and extent of cross-examination are matters that are entrusted to the sound discretion of the trial court"

  8. People v. Gissendanner

    48 N.Y.2d 543 (N.Y. 1979)   Cited 738 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Gissendanner, the court reviewed a lower court's denial of a defendant's request to issue a subpoena for the police personnel files of prosecution witnesses.

  9. People v. Concepcion

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 5110 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 225 times
    Noting that New York Criminal Procedure Law Section 470.15 bars the Appellate Division "from affirming a judgment, sentence or order on a ground not decided adversely to the appellant by the trial court"

  10. People v. Wharton

    74 N.Y.2d 921 (N.Y. 1989)   Cited 294 times
    In People v. Wharton (74 NY2d 921, 922-923), we explained that a trained police officer's identification of a defendant "at a place and time sufficiently connected and contemporaneous to the arrest itself as to constitute the ordinary and proper completion of an integral police procedure" was not the sort of event "ordinarily burdened or compromised by forbidden suggestiveness, warranting a lineup procedure or Wade hearing."