40 Cited authorities

  1. Felder v. Casey

    487 U.S. 131 (1988)   Cited 1,177 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a state law imposing a 120–day notice-of-injury prerequisite for claims against governmental defendants is preempted in actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
  2. Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail Road

    70 N.Y.2d 382 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 2,932 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, where plaintiff alleged that defendant failed to exercise "due care" in the design of a railroad project, plaintiff's negligence allegations were "merely a restatement, albeit in slightly different language, of the 'implied' contractual obligations asserted in the cause of action for breach of contract. Moreover, the damages plaintiff allegedly sustained as a consequence of defendant's violation of a 'duty of due care' in designing the project were clearly within contemplation of the written agreement."
  3. Hardy v. New York City Health Hosp. Corp.

    164 F.3d 789 (2d Cir. 1999)   Cited 474 times
    Holding that questions of statutory interpretation are reviewed de novo
  4. Wetherill v. Eli Lilly & Co.

    89 N.Y.2d 506 (N.Y. 1997)   Cited 169 times
    Holding that " CPLR § 214–c's reference to ‘discovery of the injury’ was intended to mean discovery of the condition on which the claim was based and nothing more"
  5. Hymowitz v. Lilly Co.

    73 N.Y.2d 487 (N.Y. 1989)   Cited 208 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that relaxation of the traditional product identification requirement in tort law to provide a forum to innocent victims of the drug DES was not a "clearly excessive" burden "in relation to the putative local benefits" and, hence, was not violative of the Commerce Clause
  6. City of New York v. State

    86 N.Y.2d 286 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 112 times
    Observing "extreme reluctance of courts to intrude in the political relationships between the Legislature, the State and its governmental subdivisions"
  7. Aristy-Farer v. State

    2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 5175 (N.Y. 2017)   Cited 55 times

    06-27-2017 Miriam ARISTY–FARER et al., Respondents, v. STATE of New York et al., Appellants. New Yorkers for Students' Educational Rights ("NYSER") et al., Respondents, v. State of New York et al., Appellants. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Andrew W. Amend, Barbara D. Underwood, Steven C. Wu and Philip V. Tisne of counsel), for appellants. Michael A. Rebell, New York City and Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, New York City (Douglas T. Schwarz, John A. Vassallo, III, Peter Shadzik

  8. Cnty. of Chemung v. Shah

    2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 7043 (N.Y. 2016)   Cited 40 times

    10-27-2016 In the Matter of COUNTY OF CHEMUNG, Respondent, v. Nirav R. SHAH, M.D., M.P.H., as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, et al., Appellants. In the Matter of County of St. Lawrence, Respondent, v. Nirav R. Shah, M.D., M.P.H., as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, et al., Appellants. (And Two Other Related Proceedings.) In the Matter of County of Chautauqua, Appellant, v. Nirav R. Shah, M.D., M.P.H., as Commissioner of the New York State Department

  9. Matter Lakeland Dist. v. Onondaga Auth

    24 N.Y.2d 400 (N.Y. 1969)   Cited 161 times
    In Lakeland Water Dist. the challenge was to a resolution by the County Water Authority adopting an across-the-board schedule which increased rates and charges of the authority applicable to all its customers.
  10. In re N.Y. Charter School Assoc

    2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 5204 (N.Y. 2009)   Cited 25 times
    Holding that charter schools are not political subdivisions of the State, and the task of auditing charter schools was not incidental to audits of public school districts
  11. Section 40101 - Policy

    49 U.S.C. § 40101   Cited 560 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "providing assistance to law enforcement agencies in the enforcement of laws related to regulation of controlled substances" is "in the public interest"