§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation.---------------------------------Stanislaw Faltynowicz, et al., Appellants, State of New York, Intervenor-Appellant,v.Battery Park City Authority, et al., Respondents.---------------------------------Santiago Alvear, Appellant, State of New York, Intervenor-Appellant, v. Battery Park City Authority, Respondent.---------------------------------Peter Curley et al., Appellants, State of New York, Intervenor-Appellant, v. Battery Park City Authority, Respondent.

Brief

8 Cited authorities

  1. Lombardi v. Whitman

    485 F.3d 73 (2d Cir. 2007)   Cited 217 times
    Holding that officials’ allegedly false reassurances as to air safety in lower Manhattan after 9/11 attack did not shock the conscience

  2. In re World Trade Ctr. Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litig.

    44 F. Supp. 3d 409 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)   Cited 18 times
    Finding that Espinal and Moch stood for "the general public policy that courts will not impose a tort duty on a contracting party where doing so would expose the party to potentially unlimited and undefined liability" and finding a duty where there was "no risk of ... boundless tort liability"

  3. Ruotolo v. State of New York

    83 N.Y.2d 248 (N.Y. 1994)   Cited 21 times
    Rejecting argument that the legislature may violate the state's due process rights by enacting a law reviving unenforceable claims

  4. Felder v. New York

    53 A.D.3d 401 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)   Cited 5 times

    July 1, 2008. Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Michael D. Stallman, J.), entered August 3, 2006, granting petitioners' application to serve a late notice of claim for respiratory injuries arising from the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the application denied and the petition denied and the proceeding dismissed. Before: Nardelli, J.P., Williams, Buckley and Sweeny, JJ. Although the Air Transportation Safety and

  5. Gallewski v. Hentz Co.

    301 N.Y. 164 (N.Y. 1950)   Cited 51 times
    Upholding a statute that retroactively tolled the statute of limitations for the period during which the plaintiff's country was under German occupation during World War II

  6. Robinson v. Robins Dry Dock Repair Co.

    238 N.Y. 271 (N.Y. 1924)   Cited 86 times
    Rejecting a due process challenge to statute that revised claims in response to a U.S. Supreme Court decision

  7. Section 50-E - Notice of claim

    N.Y. Gen. Mun. Law § 50-E   Cited 4,863 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Providing that an application for leave to serve a late notice of claim shall be made to “the supreme court or to the county court”

  8. Section 500.13 - Content and form of briefs in normal course appeals

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.13

    (a) Content. All briefs shall conform to the requirements of section 500.1 of this Part and contain a table of contents, a table of cases and authorities, questions presented, point headings, and, if necessary, a disclosure statement pursuant to section 500.1(f) of this Part. Such disclosure statement shall be included before the table of contents in the party's principal brief. Appellant's brief shall include a statement showing that the court has jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and to review