20 Cited authorities

  1. Blank v. Kirwan

    39 Cal.3d 311 (Cal. 1985)   Cited 3,093 times
    Holding that the standard for a failure to state a claim is whether "the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action"
  2. Lazar v. Superior Court

    12 Cal.4th 631 (Cal. 1996)   Cited 1,693 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that justifiable reliance is a required element of a fraud claim
  3. Robinson Helicopter Co. v. Dana Corp.

    34 Cal.4th 979 (Cal. 2004)   Cited 776 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding the "narrow" exception to the economic loss rule is "limited to a defendant's affirmative misrepresentations on which a plaintiff relies and which expose a plaintiff to liability for personal damages."
  4. Moore v. Regents of University of California

    51 Cal.3d 120 (Cal. 1990)   Cited 619 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in obtaining a patient's consent to a procedure, "a physician must disclose personal interests unrelated to the patient's health, whether research or economic, that may affect the physician's professional judgment"
  5. Tarmann v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

    2 Cal.App.4th 153 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)   Cited 499 times
    Holding that, when suing a corporate defendant for fraud, a plaintiff must include “the names of the persons who made the allegedly fraudulent representations, their authority to speak, to whom they spoke, what they said or wrote, and when it was said or written”
  6. Blickman Turkus, LP v. MF Downtown Sunnyvale, LLC

    162 Cal.App.4th 858 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 274 times
    Finding that duplication is not grounds for demurrer and that a motion to strike is the proper way to address duplicative material
  7. AAS v. SUPERIOR COURT

    24 Cal.4th 627 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 282 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Finding diminished value of residences containing hazardous defects not compensable
  8. Linear Tech. v. Applied Materials

    152 Cal.App.4th 115 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 227 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding a corporate plaintiff "may not rely on the UCL" in a contract action where neither the general public or individual consumers are implicated
  9. Kaldenbach v. Mutual of Omaha Life Insurance Co.

    178 Cal.App.4th 830 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 170 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Affirming denial of class certification of UCL claims where the defendants' insurance policies were sold by independent agents who were not required to attend a training or adhere to a scripted sales presentation, such that resolution of the UCL claims would require an "inquiry into the practices employed by any given independent agent - such as whether the agent involved in any given transaction took [defendants'] training and read [defendants'] manuals or used the training and materials in sales presentations, and what materials, disclosures, representations, and explanations were given to any given purchaser"
  10. Tenet Healthsystem Desert, Inc. v. Blue Cross of California

    245 Cal.App.4th 821 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016)   Cited 71 times
    Holding that an insurance company's repeated requests to a hospital about whether a patient's treatments were medically necessary falsely implied that the patient's insurance policy covered the treatments, and so could give rise to claims for fraud and misrepresentation