§Why CasetextPricing

Response Reply

undefined

16 Cited authorities

  1. Lisa M. v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital

    12 Cal.4th 291 (Cal. 1995)   Cited 274 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that although a hospital technician's sexual assault of a patient was enabled by his employment, the tort was not foreseeable and did not arise out of emotions engendered by the job

  2. Farmers Ins. Group v. County of Santa Clara

    11 Cal.4th 992 (Cal. 1995)   Cited 238 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the County could not be held vicariously liable for sexual harassment by a deputy sheriff who worked at jail, even though harassment occurred during work hours at the jail, because the misconduct was "motivated for strictly personal reasons unrelated to the guarding of inmates or the performance of any other duty"

  3. John R. v. Oakland Unified School Dist.

    48 Cal.3d 438 (Cal. 1989)   Cited 248 times
    Holding that individual instances of sexual harassment of students by teachers does not impute liability to the school districts under the doctrine of respondeat superior

  4. Hoff v. Vacaville Unified School Dist.

    19 Cal.4th 925 (Cal. 1998)   Cited 187 times
    Holding "public entities have no affirmative duty to warn of the release of an inmate with a violent history unless the inmate makes a specific threat against a specific, identifiable victim or group of victims"

  5. Hoyem v. Manhattan Beach City Sch. Dist

    22 Cal.3d 508 (Cal. 1978)   Cited 186 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a school district had a duty to a student who was injured by a motorcycle off campus where the school failed to supervise the student and he wandered off

  6. Stamps v. Superior Court

    136 Cal.App.4th 1441 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 67 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Stamps, the Court noted that the Brown case also incorrectly treated section 51.9 as an Unruh Civil Rights claim, Stamps, 136 Cal. App. 4th at 1450.

  7. Doe by and Through Doe v. Petaluma City School Dist.

    830 F. Supp. 1560 (N.D. Cal. 1993)   Cited 93 times
    Holding that, where intentional discrimination is shown, schools can be held liable for monetary damages under Title IX, 20 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., for failing to eradicate hostile environment caused by peer sexual harassment

  8. Dailey v. Los Angeles Unified Sch. Dist.

    2 Cal.3d 741 (Cal. 1970)   Cited 162 times
    Holding a duty existed for school employees to prevent students from harming each other

  9. Clausing v. San Francisco Unified School Dist.

    221 Cal.App.3d 1224 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990)   Cited 85 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding there is no cause of action for damages under article I, section 1, because that provision does not impose a mandatory duty on public entities to protect a citizen's right to privacy

  10. West Shield Investigations v. Superior Court

    82 Cal.App.4th 935 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 54 times
    Holding "[q]uestions of materiality and justifiable reliance constitute questions of fact"

  11. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,753 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system

  12. Rule 4.1 - Serving Other Process

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.1   Cited 245 times
    Instructing that "[p]rocess . . . may be served anywhere within the territorial limits of the state where the district court is located"