20 Cited authorities

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green

    411 U.S. 792 (1973)   Cited 53,087 times   96 Legal Analyses
    Holding in employment discrimination case that statistical evidence of employer's general policy and practice may be relevant circumstantial evidence of discriminatory intent behind individual employment decision
  2. Harris v. Forklift Sys., Inc.

    510 U.S. 17 (1993)   Cited 12,599 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "no single factor is required" to show a hostile work environment, including "whether [the acts are] physically threatening"
  3. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Servs., Inc.

    523 U.S. 75 (1998)   Cited 5,270 times   50 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[w]hatever evidentiary route the plaintiff chooses to follow, he or she must always prove that the conduct at issue was not merely tinged with offensive . . . connotations"
  4. Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins

    507 U.S. 604 (1993)   Cited 1,936 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that age and years of service, pension status, or seniority are "analytically distinct" and an employer may rely on one while ignoring the other
  5. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.

    24 Cal.4th 317 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 3,301 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an implied covenant "cannot be endowed with an existence independent of its contractual underpinnings. It cannot impose substantive duties or limits on the contracting parties beyond those incorporated in the specific terms of their agreement."
  6. Yanowitz v. L'Oreal USA Inc.

    36 Cal.4th 1028 (Cal. 2005)   Cited 1,569 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that to establish a "protected activity," an "employee's communications to the employer [must] sufficiently convey the employee's reasonable concerns that the employer has acted or is acting in an unlawful discriminatory manner."
  7. Roby v. McKesson Corp.

    47 Cal.4th 686 (Cal. 2009)   Cited 539 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding "there is no basis for excluding evidence of biased personnel management actions so long as that evidence is relevant to prove the communication of a hostile message"
  8. Janken v. GM Hughes Electronics

    46 Cal.App.4th 55 (Cal. Ct. App. 1996)   Cited 551 times
    Holding that "[t]he intentional infliction of emotional distress claim fails" where "[t]he factual allegations . . . plead claims of discrimination" but not more
  9. Trujillo v. North County Transit Dist.

    63 Cal.App.4th 280 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 482 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the statutory language of § 12940 does not "support recovery on . . . a private right of action where there has been a specific factual finding that [the alleged] discrimination or harassment actually occurred at the plaintiffs's workplace"
  10. Abeita v. Transamerica Mailings, Inc.

    159 F.3d 246 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 354 times
    Holding that a plaintiffs assertions that a coworker's sexual and derogatory gender-based comments were "commonplace," "ongoing," and "continuing" crea1 ed a genuine issue of material fact as to her hostile-work-environment claim where those assertions were supported by evidence in interrogatories and deposition testimony that described in detail the specific remarks and the approximate dates on which they occurred throughout her term of employment
  11. Section 2000e - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e   Cited 52,350 times   130 Legal Analyses
    Granting EEOC authority to issue procedural regulations to carry out Title VII provisions
  12. Section 11019 - Terms, Conditions and Privileges of Employment

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 2 § 11019   Cited 36 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Defining harassment