8 Cited authorities

Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc.
555 U.S. 7 (2008) Cited 18,107 times 72 Legal Analyses
Holding that preliminary injunctions "may only be awarded upon a clear showing that the plaintiff is entitled to such relief"
Covenant Care, Inc. v. Superior Court
32 Cal.4th 771 (Cal. 2004) Cited 136 times 2 Legal Analyses
In Covenant Care, Inc. v. Superior Court, 86 P.3d 290 (Cal. 2004), the California Supreme Court confronted the sad story of Juan Inclan, an "elder," during his eight-week stay at a "skilled nursing facility."
Merco Constr. Engineers, Inc. v. Municipal Court
21 Cal.3d 724 (Cal. 1978) Cited 109 times
Refusing a writ of mandamus allowing a corporation to appear through a non-attorney agent in municipal court
Dino v. Pelayo
145 Cal.App.4th 347 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006) Cited 42 times
Finding that so long as "some sort of confidential or fiduciary relationship" existed, disqualification motion is proper
Gantman v. United Pacific Ins. Co.
232 Cal.App.3d 1560 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991) Cited 67 times
Stating that a non-party to a contract cannot seek to enforce its terms
Cooley v. Superior Court
140 Cal.App.4th 1039 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006) Cited 26 times
In Cooley v. Superior Court (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 1039 (Cooley), the plaintiff served a deposition subpoena on the custodian of records of the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office (a nonparty), seeking documents that it possessed because of the investigation of a criminal offense.
Roberts v. Gulf Oil Corp.
147 Cal.App.3d 770 (Cal. Ct. App. 1983) Cited 34 times
Holding that corporations do not have a right to privacy under the California Constitution, nor a fundamental right to privacy, but do have a "general right to privacy"
Baker Divide Mining Co. v. Maxfield
83 Cal.App.2d 241 (Cal. Ct. App. 1948) Cited 7 times
Docket No. 7384. January 13, 1948. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Placer County. Dal M. Lemmon, Judge assigned. Affirmed. Zeutzius Steffes, A.P.G. Steffes and Thomas F. Sargent for Appellant. Wm. F. Rose, Carl E. Day and Floyd H. Bowers for Respondent. ADAMS, P.J. Plaintiff, the respondent, brought this action in ejectment against the defendant, appellant, to recover possession of 1,929.81 acres, more or less, of mining land in Placer County, and for damages for the alleged wrongful

Memorandum Points and Authorities

8 Cited authorities

Holding that preliminary injunctions "may only be awarded upon a clear showing that the plaintiff is entitled to such relief"

In Covenant Care, Inc. v. Superior Court, 86 P.3d 290 (Cal. 2004), the California Supreme Court confronted the sad story of Juan Inclan, an "elder," during his eight-week stay at a "skilled nursing facility."

Refusing a writ of mandamus allowing a corporation to appear through a non-attorney agent in municipal court

Finding that so long as "some sort of confidential or fiduciary relationship" existed, disqualification motion is proper

Stating that a non-party to a contract cannot seek to enforce its terms

In Cooley v. Superior Court (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 1039 (Cooley), the plaintiff served a deposition subpoena on the custodian of records of the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office (a nonparty), seeking documents that it possessed because of the investigation of a criminal offense.

Holding that corporations do not have a right to privacy under the California Constitution, nor a fundamental right to privacy, but do have a "general right to privacy"