Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela

Holding that the FAA precluded a court from applying California's contra proferentem doctrine to construe ambiguity in an arbitration agreement as to the availability of class arbitration against its drafter; stating "an equal treatment principle cannot save from preemption general rules that target arbitration either by name or by more subtle methods, such as by 'interfer[ing] with fundamental attributes of arbitration'"

Powerine Oil Co., Inc. v. Superior Court

Holding that where the facts are undisputed, interpretation of an insurance policy is a "question of law"

Ruiz v. Moss Bros. Auto Group, Inc.

Finding insufficient declarant's "only offer[ing] her unsupported assertion that [plaintiff] was the person who electronically signed the 2011 agreement"

Parada v. Superior Court (Monex Deposit Co.)

Finding no clear and unmistakable delegation where the contract included a severability provision applicable "[i]n the event that any provision of this Agreement shall be determined by a trier of fact of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable;" reasoning that this language suggested that "the trial court also may find a provision, including the arbitration provision, unenforceable"

Dennison v. Rosland Capital LLC

In Dennison, the contradictory language was in a section of the contract different from the section in which the delegation provision was found.

Howard v. Goldbloom