§Why CasetextPricing

Order After Hearing POS

undefined

3 Cited authorities

  1. Morton v. Wagner

    156 Cal.App.4th 963 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 160 times
    Reviewing court would not consider appeal of underlying order where notice of appeal identified only denial of reconsideration; observing “[c]are must be taken in drafting the notice of appeal to identify the order or judgment being appealed so as not to mislead or prejudice the respondent”

  2. Goodrich v. Sierra Vista Reg'l Med. Ctr.

    246 Cal.App.4th 1260 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016)   Cited 20 times

    2d Civil No. B259724 04-27-2016 Karen E. GOODRICH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SIERRA VISTA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant and Respondent. Fenton Law Group, Benjamin J. Fenton and Dennis E. Lee, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Appellant. Hall, Hieatt & Connely and Stephanie A. Bowen, San Luis Obispo, for Defendant and Respondent. PERREN, J. Fenton Law Group, Benjamin J. Fenton and Dennis E. Lee, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Appellant. Hall, Hieatt & Connely and Stephanie A. Bowen, San Luis Obispo

  3. Rule 3.1308 - Tentative rulings

    Cal. R. 3.1308   Cited 61 times

    (a) Tentative ruling procedures A trial court that offers a tentative ruling procedure in civil law and motion matters must follow one of the following procedures: (1)Notice of intent to appear required The court must make its tentative ruling available by telephone and also, at the option of the court, by any other method designated by the court, by no later than 3:00 p.m. the court day before the scheduled hearing. If the court desires oral argument, the tentative ruling must so direct. The tentative