§Why CasetextPricing

Memorandum Points and Authorities

undefined

10 Cited authorities

  1. Williams v. Superior Court

    3 Cal.5th 531 (Cal. 2017)   Cited 244 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Concluding fear of retaliation cuts in favor of "facilitating collective actions so that individual employees need not run the risk of individual suits"

  2. Schnabel v. Superior Court

    5 Cal.4th 704 (Cal. 1993)   Cited 158 times
    Recognizing that the privilege against disclosure of income tax returns does not apply where there is an intentional relinquishment, the gravamen of the lawsuit is so inconsistent with its continued assertion, or a public policy greater than that of the confidentiality of tax returns is involved

  3. SCC Acquisitions, Inc. v. Superior Court (Western Albuquerque Land Holdings, LLC)

    243 Cal.App.4th 741 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015)   Cited 28 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding "corporations do not have a right of privacy protected by the California Constitution"

  4. Weingarten v. Superior Court

    102 Cal.App.4th 268 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 40 times
    Finding public policy interests in preventing and punishing both fraud and discovery abuses

  5. Ameri-Med. Corp. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

    42 Cal.App.4th 1260 (Cal. Ct. App. 1996)   Cited 31 times
    Reaffirming that "artificial entities" have non-constitutional privacy rights that are context-dependent

  6. Webb v. Standard Oil Co.

    49 Cal.2d 509 (Cal. 1957)   Cited 93 times
    Holding that the California Revenue and Taxation Code implicitly creates a privilege against the disclosure of income tax returns

  7. Section 2023.030 - Sanctions for misuse of discovery process

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2023.030   Cited 518 times
    Providing for sanctions "[t]o the extent authorized by the chapter governing any particular discovery method"

  8. Section 1985.3 - Service on consumer whose records are being sought

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1985.3   Cited 111 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Subpoenaing consumer's personal records

  9. Section 1987.2 - Reasonable expenses in making or opposing motions

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1987.2   Cited 47 times

    (a) Except as specified in subdivision (c), in making an order pursuant to motion made under subdivision (c) of Section 1987 or under Section 1987.1, the court may in its discretion award the amount of the reasonable expenses incurred in making or opposing the motion, including reasonable attorney's fees, if the court finds the motion was made or opposed in bad faith or without substantial justification or that one or more of the requirements of the subpoena was oppressive. (b) (1) Notwithstanding

  10. Section 17704.10 - Inspection and copy of records

    Cal. Corp. Code § 17704.10   Cited 8 times   1 Legal Analyses

    (a) Upon the request of a member or transferee, for purposes reasonably related to the interest of that person as a member or a transferee, a manager or, if the limited liability company is member-managed, a member in possession of the requested information, shall promptly deliver, in writing, to the member or transferee, at the expense of the limited liability company, a copy of the information required to be maintained by paragraphs (1), (2), and (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 17701.13, and