6 Cited authorities

  1. Serrano v. Unruh

    32 Cal.3d 621 (Cal. 1982)   Cited 406 times
    Holding that "unless special circumstances would render such an award unjust," "parties who qualify for a fee should recover for all hours reasonably spent, including those on fee-related matters."
  2. Kendall-Jackson Winery v. Superior Court

    76 Cal.App.4th 970 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999)   Cited 205 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting such a "narrow rule"
  3. Concepcion v. Amscan Holdings, Inc.

    223 Cal.App.4th 1309 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014)   Cited 79 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that movant may support a fees motion with "declarations or redacted or unredacted timesheets or billing records"
  4. Robertson v. Rodriguez

    36 Cal.App.4th 347 (Cal. Ct. App. 1995)   Cited 130 times
    Applying clear and convincing standard of proof where plaintiff had to prove actual malice by that standard
  5. Levy v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.

    4 Cal.App.4th 807 (Cal. Ct. App. 1992)   Cited 76 times
    Affirming taxation of costs, where memorandum listed "other expenses authorized by statute and case law per declaration," declaration did not address them, and party did not substantiate them after objection; presuming the "court, in its sound discretion, found that the charges were excessive"
  6. Krug v. Maschemeier

    172 Cal.App.4th 796 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 41 times
    Interpreting § 527.6, former subd., a precursor to § 527.6, subd.