§Why CasetextPricing

Memorandum Points and Authorities

undefined

7 Cited authorities

  1. Hagberg v. California Federal Bank FSB

    32 Cal.4th 350 (Cal. 2004)   Cited 396 times
    Holding that civilians who provide information leading to an arrest cannot be held liable for false arrest

  2. Thomas v. Quintero

    126 Cal.App.4th 635 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 164 times
    Finding defendant's participation in an organized protest regarding tenants' rights aimed at "a genuine effort to engage the members of [the plaintiff's] congregation in discussing and finding a solution to the disputes" protected activity

  3. Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court

    56 Cal.2d 355 (Cal. 1961)   Cited 291 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Greyhound, the plaintiff in a personal injury suit arising from a car accident sought written statements that had been obtained from witnesses by the defendant's insurance adjusters and investigators.

  4. Schraer v. Berkeley Property Owners' Assn.

    207 Cal.App.3d 719 (Cal. Ct. App. 1989)   Cited 129 times
    Noting the state has expressed, by statute and in the California Constitution (§ 527.6; Cal. Const., art. I, § 1, respectively), a compelling interest in protecting individuals from harassing conduct

  5. Coito v. Superior Court (State of California)

    54 Cal.4th 480 (Cal. 2012)   Cited 53 times   4 Legal Analyses
    In Coito, one party's counsel attempted to use the efforts of the other party's counsel to find witnesses and information about the case that was readily available to both parties.

  6. Diamond View Limited v. Herz

    180 Cal.App.3d 612 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986)   Cited 34 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Diamond View and similar cases, our courts have considered whether a corporate entity has standing to seek redress under section 527.6 even though it is not a "person."

  7. Fuss v. Superior Court

    273 Cal.App.2d 807 (Cal. Ct. App. 1969)   Cited 3 times

    Docket No. 34379. June 10, 1969. PROCEEDING in mandamus to compel the Superior Court of Los Angeles County to set aside its order denying motions to produce documents for inspection and copying, to require further answers to interrogatories, and to require further answers to deposition questions. Writ granted. Pacht, Ross, Warne, Bernhard, Sears Nutter, Harvey M. Grossman and Henry J. Shames for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent. Rosenthal Leon and Gerald H. Wiener for Real Parties in Interest