499 U.S. 340 (1991) Cited 3,366 times 44 Legal Analyses
Holding "it is beyond dispute that compilations of facts are within the subject matter of copyright" even though "copyright protects only the author's original contributions—not the facts or information conveyed"
Holding that § 340.6 did not bar plaintiff's fee dispute claim that attorney refused to return unearned attorney's fees, because the claim could also be construed as conversion
Holding that interference with plaintiff's performance may give rise to a claim for interference with contractual relations if plaintiff's performance is made more costly or more burdensome
Holding that a "jury instruction on patent misuse" was overbroad, where it "focused primarily on the charge that [the patent holder] was attempting to enforce the patents against goods known not to be infringing"
Holding that, to be an inventor with standing to bring a section 256 claim, the alleged inventor must have "contribute[d] to the conception of the claimed invention."
18 U.S.C. § 1839 Cited 1,186 times 101 Legal Analyses
Recognizing that misappropriation is present where the acquiring entity “knows or has reason to know that the trade secret was acquired by improper means”