§Why CasetextPricing

Memorandum Points and Authorities

undefined

19 Cited authorities

  1. Shelton v. Tucker

    364 U.S. 479 (1960)   Cited 1,191 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that disclosure of every organization teachers had joined in the previous five years was not rationally related to the State's interest in determining their fitness and competency

  2. Britt v. Superior Court

    20 Cal.3d 844 (Cal. 1978)   Cited 168 times
    Holding that patient "may not withhold information which relates to any physical or mental condition which they have put in issue"

  3. Vinson v. Superior Court

    43 Cal.3d 833 (Cal. 1987)   Cited 85 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding no right for the attorney to attend the psychiatric examination and leaving that decision to the trial court's discretion

  4. Calcor Space Facility, Inc. v. Superior Court

    53 Cal.App.4th 216 (Cal. Ct. App. 1997)   Cited 34 times
    Requesting party bears burden to determine "the manner in which [the responding party] maintains its records"

  5. Unzipped Apparel v. Bader

    156 Cal.App.4th 123 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 19 times
    Recognizing 60-day time limit under section 2025.480, subdivision (b) applies to nonparty deposition subpoena requesting business records, just as it applies to a subpoena for an oral or written deposition

  6. California Shellfish, Inc. v. United Shellfish Co.

    56 Cal.App.4th 16 (Cal. Ct. App. 1997)   Cited 16 times
    Holding that the losing party has the burden to show "substantial justification" under a discovery sanction statute, which uses the same language as section 405.38

  7. Section 210 - "Relevant evidence"

    Cal. Evid. Code § 210   Cited 3,006 times
    Defining relevant evidence

  8. Section 350 - Relevance

    Cal. Evid. Code § 350   Cited 1,627 times
    Providing only relevant evidence is admissible

  9. Section 2701 - Unlawful access to stored communications

    18 U.S.C. § 2701   Cited 1,347 times   135 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any person who "intentionally accesses without authorization a facility through which an electronic communication service is provided ... and thereby obtains, alters, or prevents authorized access to a wire or electronic communication while it is in electronic storage"

  10. Section 2023.030 - Sanctions for misuse of discovery process

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2023.030   Cited 508 times
    Providing for sanctions "[t]o the extent authorized by the chapter governing any particular discovery method"

  11. Section 2023.010 - Misuses of discovery process

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2023.010   Cited 363 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Defining unsuccessful and unjustified opposition to a motion to compel as a misuse of the discovery process

  12. Section 2017.010 - Generally

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2017.010   Cited 139 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Allowing discovery of relevant non-privileged material

  13. Section 1987 - Service of subpoena

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1987   Cited 133 times
    Articulating alternative service rules when the subpoenaed person is a minor

  14. Section 1985.3 - Service on consumer whose records are being sought

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1985.3   Cited 110 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Subpoenaing consumer's personal records

  15. Section 1987.1 - Motion for order quashing, modifying or directing compliance with subpoena including protective orders

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1987.1   Cited 62 times
    Setting forth procedure to quash subpoena duces tecum

  16. Section 20 - Judicial remedies

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 20   Cited 52 times

    Judicial remedies are such as are administered by the Courts of justice, or by judicial officers empowered for that purpose by the Constitution and statutes of this State. Ca. Civ. Proc. Code § 20 Enacted 1872.