§Why CasetextPricing

Application Ex Parte No Fees

undefined

38 Cited authorities

  1. Huntingdon Life Sciences, Inc. v. Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty USA, Inc.

    129 Cal.App.4th 1228 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 310 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding one plaintiff lacked standing to pursue certain claims

  2. R.D. v. P.M.

    202 Cal.App.4th 181 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 206 times
    Holding that civil harassment restraining order is appealable as an order granting an injunction; § 904.1, subd. [order granting or refusing to grant an injunction is appealable].

  3. Schild v. Rubin

    232 Cal.App.3d 755 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)   Cited 294 times
    Holding that the alleged emotional distress must be so "intense, enduring and nontrivial" that it exceeds what a reasonable person in a civilized society should be expected to endure

  4. Thomas v. Quintero

    126 Cal.App.4th 635 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 167 times
    Finding defendant's participation in an organized protest regarding tenants' rights aimed at "a genuine effort to engage the members of [the plaintiff's] congregation in discussing and finding a solution to the disputes" protected activity

  5. Siam v. Kizilbash

    130 Cal.App.4th 1563 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 152 times
    Holding that "statements . . . designed to prompt action by law enforcement" satisfy § 425.16, subd. (e)'s definition of protected activity

  6. Duronslet v. Kamps

    203 Cal.App.4th 717 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012)   Cited 126 times
    Holding physician-patient privilege does not apply to nurses or other medical staff working under physician's supervision or acting as physician's agent

  7. Brekke v. Wills

    125 Cal.App.4th 1400 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 144 times
    Holding that song lyrics, if used to harass and ridicule, are not protected speech.

  8. Kenne v. Stennis

    230 Cal.App.4th 953 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014)   Cited 102 times
    Holding that even making allegedly false police reports is protected petitioning activity under the anti-SLAPP statute when falsity is not conceded

  9. Russell v. Douvan

    112 Cal.App.4th 399 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003)   Cited 136 times
    Reversing injunction issued against a lawyer based on a one-time incident of battery against opposing counsel when the evidence showed the attorneys did not regularly do business together or oppose one another

  10. Freeman v. Sullivant

    192 Cal.App.4th 523 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 110 times
    Ruling on a motion for continuance is not an appealable order

  11. Section 6254 - Exemptions from disclosure

    Cal. Gov. Code § 6254   Cited 393 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Restricting the dissemination of information to the public about the "home address and telephone number of peace officers"