Frisby v. Schultz

Holding that residential streets are traditional public fora

Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.

Holding that for an act to be "unfair," it must "threaten" a violation of law or "violate the policy or spirit of one of those laws because its effects are comparable to or the same as a violation of the law"

Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.

Holding that an injunction against anti-abortion protesters was not viewpoint discriminatory because "none of the restrictions imposed by the court were directed at the contents of petitioner's message."

Dallas v. Stanglin

Holding that dance-hall patrons who "com[e] together to engage in recreational dancing" are not engaged in expressive association

People ex Rel. Gallo v. Acuna

Holding that preliminary injunctions are reviewed "under an abuse of discretion standard"

Farmers Ins. Exchange v. Superior Court

Holding that the UCL " 'borrows' violations of other laws and treats these violations, when committed pursuant to business activity, as unlawful practices independently actionable under [the UCL]"

County of Santa Clara v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

Holding that lead paint manufacturers could incur nuisance liability for their "intentional promotion of the use of lead paint on the interiors of buildings with knowledge of the public health hazard that this would create," but not for their "mere manufacture and distribution of lead paint or their failure to warn of its hazards"

Angelucci v. Century Supper Club

Holding that the Unruh Act "must be construed liberally in order to carry out its purpose"

IT Corp. v. County of Imperial

Holding that the presumption is rebuttable

People v. Conagra Grocery Prods. Co.

In ConAgra, the court did not enjoin the defendants to remove all lead-based paint from all houses in plaintiffs' jurisdictions.

Section 17200 - Unfair competition defined

Prohibiting unlawful business practices

Section 17203 - Injunctive relief

Requiring that an individual plead that she lost "money or property" because of the alleged deceptive conduct

Section 7

Providing that " county or city may make and enforce within its limits all local, police, sanitary, and other ordinances and regulations not in conflict with general laws"

Section 527 - Preliminary injunctions and temporary restraining orders

Entitling parties opposing preliminary injunctions to one continuance "to enable the opposing party to meet the application for a preliminary injunction"

Section 731 - Action by person whose property affected; civil action in name of people of state

In section 731 the Legislature meant to allow cities, as well as the state, to continue to bring such actions: the statute gives district attorneys and city attorneys the concurrent right to file such suits, and even provides that the city attorney "must bring" the action if directed to do so by the legislative authority of the city.

Section 529 - Undertaking required on granting injunction

Exempting public entities

Section 995.220 - Public entities and officers not required to give bond

In section 995.220, which exempts government entities from bond requirements, the Legislature stated explicitly that "a bond in an action or proceeding" includes, but is not limited to, "a bond for issuance of a restraining order or injunction, appointment of a receiver, or stay of enforcement of a judgment on appeal."

Section 17210 - Distribution of handbills to guest rooms in hotel