In re Deutsche Bank
605 F.3d 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2010) Cited 176 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that Federal Circuit law governs such matters in the patent context and applying the Rule 26 good cause standard in assessing a proposed patent prosecution bar
U.S. Steel Corp. v. United States
730 F.2d 1465 (Fed. Cir. 1984) Cited 258 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that court erred when it prohibited access to confidential information based on attorney's status as "in-house" counsel and requiring case-by-case and attorney-by attorney determination
Intervet, Inc. v. Merial Limited
241 F.R.D. 55 (D.D.C. 2007) Cited 11 times
Finding in-house counsel was not a competitive decision-maker because her responsibilities were "exclusively either legal, administrative, or organizational"
Glaxo Inc. v. Genpharm Pharmaceuticals
796 F. Supp. 872 (E.D.N.C. 1992) Cited 12 times
Finding no jurisdiction where defendant mailed one document to plaintiff in the forum
Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 Cited 94,784 times 651 Legal Analyses
Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37