§Why CasetextPricing

D. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of South Carolina

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 6 Motion to Change Venue. The court GRANTS the motion and transfers this case to the Middle District of Tennessee. Signed

5 Cited authorities

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. Gilbert

    330 U.S. 501 (1947)   Cited 5,600 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that private interest factors include the "availability of compulsory process for attendance of un-willing, and the cost of obtaining attendance of willing, witnesses"

  2. Emp’rs Mut. Cas. v. Bartile Roofs

    618 F.3d 1153 (10th Cir. 2010)   Cited 610 times
    Holding that under Utah law, the policy definition of the term "suit" made the insurer's duty to defend dependent on the underlying allegations of liability

  3. Jewell v. Life Ins. Co.

    508 F.3d 1303 (10th Cir. 2007)   Cited 91 times
    Explaining that new evidence can only be considered in limited circumstances

  4. Michael M. v. Nexsen Pruet Grp. Med. & Dental Plan

    CASE NO. 2:17-CV-1236 TS (D. Utah Mar. 19, 2018)   Cited 7 times

    CASE NO. 2:17-CV-1236 TS 03-19-2018 MICHAEL M., BARBARA R., and LILLIAN M., Plaintiffs, v. NEXSEN PRUET GROUP MEDICAL & DENTAL PLAN and COMPANION BENEFIT ALTERNATIVES, Defendants. Judge Ted Stewart MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO TRANSFER VENUE This matter is before the Court on Defendants Companion Benefit Alternatives' ("CBA") and Nexsen Pruet Group Medical & Dental Plan's ("the Plan") (collectively, "Defendants") Motions to Transfer Venue. For the following reasons

  5. Section 1404 - Change of venue

    28 U.S.C. § 1404   Cited 28,373 times   184 Legal Analyses
    Granting Class Plaintiffs' motion to transfer action in order to "facilitate a unified settlement approval process together with the class action cases in" In re Amex ASR