17 Cited authorities

Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co.
374 F.3d 797 (9th Cir. 2004) Cited 2,662 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that, in the tort context, "[t]he `express aiming' analysis depends, to a significant degree, on the specific type of tort or other wrongful conduct at issue"
Eitel v. McCool
782 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1986) Cited 4,780 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an unqualified oral stipulation of dismissal made in open court satisfies Rule 41, even where no formal stipulation was signed by the parties"
U.S. v. Signed Personal Check No. 730
615 F.3d 1085 (9th Cir. 2010) Cited 660 times
Holding defendant satisfies "meritorious defense" requirement by "alleg[ing] sufficient facts that, if true, would constitute a defense"
Sher v. Johnson
911 F.2d 1357 (9th Cir. 1990) Cited 1,029 times
Holding that, in states with statutes identical in all relevant respects to Wash. Rev. Code § 25.05.100, the actions of one partner do not impute to another partner for purposes of personal jurisdiction
Franchise Holding II, LLC v. Huntington Restaurants Group, Inc.
375 F.3d 922 (9th Cir. 2004) Cited 598 times
Holding that factual findings on a motion to set aside a default are reviewed for clear error and the decision is reviewed for an abuse of discretion
Ackra Direct Marketing Corp. v. Fingerhut
86 F.3d 852 (8th Cir. 1996) Cited 568 times
Finding that defendant's failure to obtain substitute counsel, respond to discovery, and comply with orders of the court provided ample basis for district court's grant of default judgment for $1.2 million
American Ass'n Naturopathic Phys. v. Hayhurst
227 F.3d 1104 (9th Cir. 2000) Cited 476 times
Holding that personal jurisdiction challenges "must be raised at the first available opportunity or, if they are not, they are forever waived"
Jones v. Phipps
39 F.3d 158 (7th Cir. 1994) Cited 467 times
Holding that a jailed litigant ought to be treated neither worse, nor better, than any other party when it comes to the conduct of litigation unless some special circumstance of confinement interferes with her ability to manage legal affairs
Terracom v. Valley Nat. Bank
49 F.3d 555 (9th Cir. 1995) Cited 403 times
Holding that the defendant must have actually known that its product would reach the forum state before the "stream of commerce" theory will support the exercise of personal jurisdiction over the defendant
Walker v. Gomez
370 F.3d 969 (9th Cir. 2004) Cited 293 times
Holding prison officials are entitled to qualified immunity if it was not clearly established that race-based differentiation is unconstitutional
Rule 55 - Default; Default Judgment
Fed. R. Civ. P. 55 Cited 32,817 times 13 Legal Analyses
Adopting similar language for acquiring default judgment against the United States
Section 17500 - Untrue or misleading advertising
Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17500 Cited 2,659 times 64 Legal Analyses
Requiring action that originated in California to effect consumers in another state

UL LLC v. Gangsong Group Corp. et al

17 Cited authorities

Holding that, in the tort context, "[t]he `express aiming' analysis depends, to a significant degree, on the specific type of tort or other wrongful conduct at issue"

Holding that "an unqualified oral stipulation of dismissal made in open court satisfies Rule 41, even where no formal stipulation was signed by the parties"

Holding defendant satisfies "meritorious defense" requirement by "alleg[ing] sufficient facts that, if true, would constitute a defense"

Holding that, in states with statutes identical in all relevant respects to Wash. Rev. Code § 25.05.100, the actions of one partner do not impute to another partner for purposes of personal jurisdiction

Holding that factual findings on a motion to set aside a default are reviewed for clear error and the decision is reviewed for an abuse of discretion

Finding that defendant's failure to obtain substitute counsel, respond to discovery, and comply with orders of the court provided ample basis for district court's grant of default judgment for $1.2 million

Holding that personal jurisdiction challenges "must be raised at the first available opportunity or, if they are not, they are forever waived"

Holding that a jailed litigant ought to be treated neither worse, nor better, than any other party when it comes to the conduct of litigation unless some special circumstance of confinement interferes with her ability to manage legal affairs

Holding that the defendant must have actually known that its product would reach the forum state before the "stream of commerce" theory will support the exercise of personal jurisdiction over the defendant

Holding prison officials are entitled to qualified immunity if it was not clearly established that race-based differentiation is unconstitutional

Adopting similar language for acquiring default judgment against the United States

Requiring action that originated in California to effect consumers in another state