§Why CasetextPricing

Giganews, Inc. et al v. Perfect 10, Inc. et al

BRIEF

4 Cited authorities

  1. U.S. v. Seschillie

    310 F.3d 1208 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 109 times
    Holding that expert testimony is not required where the subject does not need expert "illumination" and the proponent is otherwise able to elicit testimony about the subject

  2. Morvant v. Const. Aggregates Corp.

    570 F.2d 626 (6th Cir. 1978)   Cited 97 times
    Rejecting argument that expert was needed to advise counsel for failure to present it to district court

  3. Rule 703 - Bases of an Expert's Opinion Testimony

    Fed. R. Evid. 703   Cited 4,718 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that facts or data of a type upon which experts in the field would reasonably rely in forming an opinion need not be admissible in order for the expert's opinion based on the facts and data to be admitted

  4. Rule 615 - Excluding Witnesses from the Courtroom; Preventing an Excluded Witness's Access to Trial Testimony

    Fed. R. Evid. 615   Cited 1,355 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Finding that a motion to exclude a witness from the courtroom is generally grantable as of right and on the court's own motion