20 Cited authorities

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
477 U.S. 242 (1986) Cited 236,049 times 38 Legal Analyses
Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett
477 U.S. 317 (1986) Cited 216,170 times 40 Legal Analyses
Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International
573 U.S. 208 (2014) Cited 1,359 times 507 Legal Analyses
Holding ineligible patent claims directed to the concept of "intermediated settlement," i.e., the use of a third party to mitigate the risk that only one party to an agreed-upon financial exchange will satisfy its obligation
Ass'n for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.
569 U.S. 576 (2013) Cited 443 times 147 Legal Analyses
Holding that "a naturally occurring DNA segment is a product of nature and not patent eligible merely because it has been isolated"
Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corp.
822 F.3d 1327 (Fed. Cir. 2016) Cited 693 times 118 Legal Analyses
Holding that claims to self-referential tables that allowed for more efficient launching and adaptation of databases were not directed to an abstract idea
Content Extraction & Transmission LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank
776 F.3d 1343 (Fed. Cir. 2014) Cited 592 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding claims directed to the "abstract idea of 1
Berkheimer v. HP Inc.
881 F.3d 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2018) Cited 500 times 47 Legal Analyses
Holding material dispute of fact regarding inventiveness created by improved redundancy, efficiency, computer functionality, and costs of operating a network or computer systems network costs that are captured by claim elements precludes summary judgment
DDR Holdings, LLC v. Hotels.com, L.P.
773 F.3d 1245 (Fed. Cir. 2014) Cited 512 times 92 Legal Analyses
Holding claims on maintaining website look-and-feel patent-eligible because claims were "necessarily rooted in computer technology in order to overcome a problem specifically arising in the realm of computer networks"
BASCOM Global Internet Services, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLC
827 F.3d 1341 (Fed. Cir. 2016) Cited 453 times 55 Legal Analyses
Holding claims eligible at step two because the claims recited a "technical improvement over prior art ways of filtering ... content" that "improve the performance of the computer system itself"
McRo, Inc. v. Bandai Namco Games Am. Inc.
837 F.3d 1299 (Fed. Cir. 2016) Cited 360 times 63 Legal Analyses
Holding that using "unconventional rules that relate to sub-sequences of phonemes, timings, and morph weight sets, is not directed to an abstract idea"
Rule 56 - Summary Judgment
Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 Cited 328,503 times 158 Legal Analyses
Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
Section 101 - Inventions patentable
35 U.S.C. § 101 Cited 3,399 times 2189 Legal Analyses
Defining patentable subject matter as "any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof."

Sound View Innovations, LLC v. Hulu, LLC

20 Cited authorities

Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"

Holding ineligible patent claims directed to the concept of "intermediated settlement," i.e., the use of a third party to mitigate the risk that only one party to an agreed-upon financial exchange will satisfy its obligation

Holding that "a naturally occurring DNA segment is a product of nature and not patent eligible merely because it has been isolated"

Holding that claims to self-referential tables that allowed for more efficient launching and adaptation of databases were not directed to an abstract idea

Holding claims directed to the "abstract idea of 1

Holding material dispute of fact regarding inventiveness created by improved redundancy, efficiency, computer functionality, and costs of operating a network or computer systems network costs that are captured by claim elements precludes summary judgment

Holding claims on maintaining website look-and-feel patent-eligible because claims were "necessarily rooted in computer technology in order to overcome a problem specifically arising in the realm of computer networks"

Holding claims eligible at step two because the claims recited a "technical improvement over prior art ways of filtering ... content" that "improve the performance of the computer system itself"

Holding that using "unconventional rules that relate to sub-sequences of phonemes, timings, and morph weight sets, is not directed to an abstract idea"

Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

Defining patentable subject matter as "any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof."