§Why CasetextPricing

Sound View Innovations, LLC v. Hulu, LLC

MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment of No Willful Infringement 254

26 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 251,860 times   279 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable

  2. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 235,893 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

  3. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 216,035 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"

  4. Halo Elecs., Inc. v. Pulse Elecs., Inc.

    136 S. Ct. 1923 (2016)   Cited 492 times   59 Legal Analyses
    Holding that section 284 " ‘commits the determination’ whether enhanced damages are appropriate ‘to the discretion of the district court’ "

  5. In re Seagate Technology

    497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2007)   Cited 792 times   86 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an "advice of counsel" defense to willful infringement does not waive the attorney-client privilege as to trial counsel partly because post-filing conduct is usually not relevant to a finding of willful infringement

  6. Westerngeco LLC v. Ion Geophysical Corp.

    138 S. Ct. 2129 (2018)   Cited 102 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting the defendant's extraterritoriality argument because the case involved a "permissible domestic application" of the patent damages statute

  7. WBIP, LLC v. Kohler Co.

    829 F.3d 1317 (Fed. Cir. 2016)   Cited 224 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a nexus can be presumed when the asserted objective indicia is tied to a specific product and the product is the invention claimed in the patent

  8. Metabolite Lab., Inc. v. Laboratory Corp.

    370 F.3d 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2004)   Cited 268 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that circumstantial evidence was sufficient to show that a method step was carried out by the direct infringer, even in the absence of direct evidence for direct infringer

  9. Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Prods. Inc.

    876 F.3d 1350 (Fed. Cir. 2017)   Cited 174 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an alleged infringer bears an initial burden of production to identify unmarked patented products

  10. Liquid Dynamics Corp. v. Vaughan Co., Inc.

    449 F.3d 1209 (Fed. Cir. 2006)   Cited 187 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a challenge as to parameters of test model goes to weight of the evidence

  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,261 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  12. Section 284 - Damages

    35 U.S.C. § 284   Cited 2,071 times   194 Legal Analyses
    Granting "interest and costs as fixed by the court"