11 Cited authorities

  1. Foman v. Davis

    371 U.S. 178 (1962)   Cited 28,557 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an appeal was improperly dismissed when the record as a whole — including a timely but incomplete notice of appeal and a premature but complete notice — revealed the orders petitioner sought to appeal
  2. Jackson v. Bank of Hawaii

    902 F.2d 1385 (9th Cir. 1990)   Cited 1,310 times
    Holding that plaintiffs are not entitled to amend to add claims that "advance different legal theories and require proof of different facts"
  3. Saul v. U.S.

    928 F.2d 829 (9th Cir. 1991)   Cited 764 times
    Holding the CSRA barred an employee's Bivens claims and preempted his state law tort claims
  4. Franzen, Director v. Duckworth

    479 U.S. 816 (1986)   Cited 227 times
    Discussing the relaxed standard of scrutiny to be applied in cases involving citizen-witness informants, and the lessened standard regarding the competency of evidence upon which probable cause may be based
  5. Kaplan v. Rose

    49 F.3d 1363 (9th Cir. 1994)   Cited 547 times
    Holding that the CEO of small company had proved good faith by submitting an uncontradicted affidavit stating that he never directed anyone to make misstatements that he knew to be misleading
  6. Acri v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers

    781 F.2d 1393 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 368 times
    Holding that accrual of cause of action was question of law when evidentiary facts regarding accrual were not in dispute
  7. Texaco, Inc. v. Ponsoldt

    939 F.2d 794 (9th Cir. 1991)   Cited 310 times
    Holding that an eight-month delay was unreasonable
  8. Roberts v. Arizona Bd. of Regents

    661 F.2d 796 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 138 times
    Holding district court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend where motion was "raised at the eleventh hour, after discovery was virtually complete and the [defendant's] motion for summary judgment was pending before the court
  9. In re Circuit Breaker Litigation

    984 F. Supp. 1267 (C.D. Cal. 1997)   Cited 29 times
    Noting that the longer the delay to amend, the less a showing of prejudice is needed for denial
  10. Cummings v. Valley Health Sys., LLC

    Case No. 2:16-cv-02486-JCM-GWF (D. Nev. Feb. 28, 2017)

    Case No. 2:16-cv-02486-JCM-GWF 02-28-2017 ANGELA CUMMINGS, Plaintiff, v. VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM, LLC, et al., Defendants. JAMES C. MAHAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER Presently before the court is plaintiff Angela Cummings' motion to amend/correct complaint. (ECF No. 21). Defendant Valley Health System, LLC filed a response (ECF No. 24), to which plaintiff replied (ECF No. 26). I. Facts The instant action involves allegations of retaliatory interference with prospective employment pursuant to

  11. Rule 15 - Amended and Supplemental Pleadings

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 15   Cited 90,251 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding that, per N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1024, New York law provides a more forgiving principle for relation back in the context of naming John Doe defendants described with particularity in the complaint