§Why CasetextPricing

In Re Snap Inc. Securities Litigation

BRIEF

15 Cited authorities

  1. INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca

    480 U.S. 421 (1987)   Cited 2,396 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the phrase "well-founded fear," which is also found in 8 U.S.C. § 1101, is ambiguous

  2. Herman MacLean v. Huddleston

    459 U.S. 375 (1983)   Cited 1,312 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an express remedy under § 11 of the 1933 Act for misleading registration statements did not preclude an overlapping implied private cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation under § 10(b) of the 1934 Act

  3. In re Initial Public Offering Securities

    241 F. Supp. 2d 281 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)   Cited 296 times
    Holding that market manipulation creates a duty to disclose

  4. In re Worlds of Wonder Securities Litigation

    35 F.3d 1407 (9th Cir. 1994)   Cited 350 times
    Holding that the bespeaks caution doctrine applies when the defendants' forward-looking representations contain sufficient cautionary language

  5. In re AOL Time Warner, Inc. Securities & “Erisa” Litigation

    381 F. Supp. 2d 192 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)   Cited 124 times
    Holding that "[w]ith respect to group-published documents such as prospectuses, plaintiffs may rely on a presumption that the group-information is the collective works of those individuals" directly involved in the day-to-day affairs of the corporation

  6. In re Countrywide Financial Corp. Securities Litigation

    588 F. Supp. 2d 1132 (C.D. Cal. 2008)   Cited 107 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding complaint persuasively alleges that "systematic changes in Countrywide came from the top down and pervaded virtually every office" because directors and officers allegedly were regularly provided "detailed exception statistics"

  7. In re Constar International Inc. Securities Litigation

    585 F.3d 774 (3d Cir. 2009)   Cited 88 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that class certification is an "especially serious decision"

  8. McMahan Co. v. Wherehouse Entertainment

    65 F.3d 1044 (2d Cir. 1995)   Cited 108 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a no-action clause cannot bar a securities claim because of express contrary language in the 1933 and 1934 acts

  9. Grossman v. Waste Management, Inc.

    589 F. Supp. 395 (N.D. Ill. 1984)   Cited 96 times
    Holding that subsequent fraud on the market may make market price an unreliable indication of the security's value

  10. IN RE BRODERBUND/LEARNING CO. SEC. LITIG

    294 F.3d 1201 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 24 times
    Finding that plaintiff could not demonstrate damages subsequent to a stock-for-stock merger when he received consideration valued at $33.45 per share in such merger, and when he had originally received his shares less than a year before in exchange for stock valued at $17.85 per share

  11. Section 77k - Civil liabilities on account of false registration statement

    15 U.S.C. § 77k   Cited 2,114 times   86 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable for a false registration statement "every person who was a director of . . . or partner in the issuer" at time of filing